SHOP BEST SELLERS
Shop our best selling products
Type: Performance Supplements
Protein Powder
Type: Performance Supplements
Electrolytes - Stick Packs
Type: Performance Supplements
Electrolytes
Type: Performance Supplements
Creatine Monohydrate
Type: Core Supplements
Source Magnesium
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Elements Shampoo
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Elements Conditioner
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Elements Tallow Soap (Lemongrass)
Type: Performance Supplements
Raw Honey
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Tallow Sun Balm
★★★★★ 1,000+ 5 Star Reviews
Pure ingredients
Raw ingredients. Ancient wisdom. Modern results. Every product contains only what nature intended:
- Grass-fed tallow rich in bioavailable nutrients
- Raw honey and adaptogenic herbs in their purest form
- Regeneratively sourced proteins, never denatured
- Zero synthetic additives or lab-made fillers
Small-batch wellness our ancestors would recognize. Because when you honor nature's integrity, your body knows the difference.
Purely Natural, Perfectly You
Let customers speak for us
5 stars
I love the way this tallow soap makes my hands feel! Just make sure you shake it before use because it does separate. It smells wonderful, very light scent and the tallow has made my hands feel softer then ever before.
I've been taking now supplements vitamin d and my blood results still show that my Vitamin D levels are low. I saw an ad for this brand and decided to try it. I just had my blood work done again and for the first time ever, my Vitamin D was in the green marker. Very happy!
I literally can't drink water without these electrolytes now. I'm not kidding. You guys killed it with this product. I take both flavors to mix and match sometimes :) I hate the taste of other electrolytes. These taste natural and very light on the flavor, which I love. Please don't ever get rid of this product!!!
This is the only protein powder I have ever taken that digests easily for me. I always struggle with bloat after a protein shake. I tried both but I LOVE THE CHOCOLATE.
Honestly love the taste of this honey. I've been buying the orange blossom for months but the saw palmetto is something else. I definitely recommend it!
Clean, great taste and doesn't leave me bloated. I finally can take protein shakes every day. I tried so many different brands, but every time I drank them I felt like puking. Can't wait to try the chocolate protein
Clean and like the moisture
I love this product. it helps to give me energy.
Trust this product! We’ve been deceived by so many products labeled CLEAN but these guys put their money where their mouth is. Sleeping noticeably better after 2 weeks of consistently taking it!
Taste great and mixes well into a smoothie
It's a bit more liquidity than the usual body wash but overall its nice. Smells good and makes my body soft.
It's a bit thick but its still nice and it smells really good. I feel as though it cleans my scalp well
It's a nice consistency, makes my hair really shiny and moisturized and smells amazing.
Love it
Why PÜRISHH?
Pure Ingredients
Handpicked and ethically sourced from trusted, natural farms.
Effective Results
Each product is designed to protect, nourish, and enhance your skin’s natural balance.
Holistic Wellness
Embrace a balanced lifestyle with supplements and creams that work in harmony with your body.
Frequently Asked Question
What makes PÜRISHH products different from conventional supplements or skincare?
What makes PÜRISHH products different from conventional supplements or skincare?
Our mission is to return to the raw, unprocessed power of nature. Every product is formulated with 100 % natural ingredients and no synthetic preservatives, fillers, or dyes. For example, the Raw Honey Butter contains whipped Wagyu beef tallow, cold‑pressed olive and coconut oils, mango butter, raw honey and beeswax – it moisturizes deeply and can even replace conventional lotion. The Raw Tallow Sunbalm uses grass‑fed tallow, non‑nano zinc oxide and organic oils to provide mineral sun protection while nourishing the skin. Our Protein Powder combines grass‑fed whey and hydrolyzed collagen with organic superfoods to deliver 26 g of easily digestible protein with zero added sugar. Across their range, Purishh keeps ingredient lists short and transparent, using only what is necessary to support health and well‑being.
Are PÜRISHH’s ingredients ethically and sustainably sourced?
Are PÜRISHH’s ingredients ethically and sustainably sourced?
Yes. The founders emphasize sustainable sourcing and ethical treatment of animals and land. Tallow for the skincare range is hand‑sourced from 100 % grass‑fed, Wagyu, halal cattle in New Zealand, ensuring humane slaughter and optimal nutrient quality. Olive and coconut oils are single‑origin, cold‑pressed. The whey in Purishh protein powder comes from grass‑fed cows raised without hormones or antibiotics, and the collagen is hydrolyzed for better absorption. These practices mean customers receive products that are both pure and sustainable.
Why does PÜRISHH use beef tallow in its skincare products?
Why does PÜRISHH use beef tallow in its skincare products?
Grass‑fed beef tallow is biocompatible with human skin; its fatty‑acid profile closely resembles natural sebum, so it’s absorbed efficiently. Properly rendered tallow is a vitamin powerhouse, naturally supplying vitamins A, D, E, and K that support cell turnover, immune function, and antioxidant protection. Tallow also contains oleic, stearic and palmitic acids that strengthen the skin’s barrier, calm inflammation and maintain moisture. Grass‑fed tallow offers a high concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), an anti‑inflammatory fatty acid. These nutrients collectively help Purishh’s Raw Honey Butter and Raw Tallow Sunbalm to moisturize, nourish and protect the skin without clogging pores or causing irritation.
How is PÜRISHH protein powder different, and why is it easy to digest?
How is PÜRISHH protein powder different, and why is it easy to digest?
Many conventional protein powders use cheap sources and add artificial thickeners or sweeteners that cause bloating and digestive discomfort. Purishh starts with grass‑fed whey processed via cold‑filtration, which preserves natural enzymes and bioactive peptides that aid digestion. It also adds hydrolyzed bovine collagen to support joints, skin and gut health. The powder uses organic monk fruit for sweetness and contains no carrageenan, gums, sucralose or artificial preservatives, so it mixes smoothly and is gentle on the stomach. Each serving provides 26 g of complete protein with only 1 g of fat and zero sugar, making it suitable for keto, gluten‑free and non‑GMO diets.
What are PÜRISHH Electrolytes, and how do they support hydration?
What are PÜRISHH Electrolytes, and how do they support hydration?
PÜRISHH’s Electrolytes formula offers clean hydration without the artificial colors and preservatives found in many sports drinks. Each serving includes over 800 mg of unrefined Himalayan salt, providing sodium and trace minerals, plus magnesium malate and potassium chloride. Organic fruit powders (raspberry or lemon‑lime) and monk fruit sweetener give a natural flavor without sugar. The formula helps replenish electrolytes lost through exercise, supports muscle function, and is keto‑friendly.
What is Raw Shilajit, and how should it be used?
What is Raw Shilajit, and how should it be used?
Raw Shilajit is a resin harvested from high‑altitude Himalayan rocks. It forms from decomposed plant material and is rich in minerals and fulvic acid. Traditionally used as an adaptogen, Shilajit helps boost energy, improve stamina and support overall health. Purishh provides 100 % pure Himalayan shilajit. Users typically dissolve a pea‑sized amount in warm water, tea or milk. Due to its potent minerals, start with a small dose and consult a healthcare professional if you have existing medical conditions.
What is the Ishh Leaky Gut Protocol?
What is the Ishh Leaky Gut Protocol?
The Ishh Leaky Gut Protocol is a step‑by‑step program designed to help restore gut health naturally. It includes dietary recommendations, lifestyle tips and natural supplements to support the intestinal lining. The protocol focuses on removing irritants, replenishing beneficial bacteria and repairing the gut barrier. It is not a medical treatment, so customers with chronic digestive issues should consult a healthcare professional before starting.
How should I store PÜRISHH products?
How should I store PÜRISHH products?
Store supplements and protein powders in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Skincare products like Raw Honey Butter and Raw Tallow Sunbalm are natural and free from artificial stabilizers; keeping them at room temperature helps maintain texture. If you live in a hot climate, refrigerating tallow‑based balms can prevent melting. Always use clean hands or a spatula to avoid introducing bacteria.
When will my order ship, and how long will delivery take?
When will my order ship, and how long will delivery take?
We ask customers to allow 2–3 business days for processing and production before an order ships. Once dispatched, average transit times are 7–10 business days; however, natural disasters, holidays and weather can cause delays. Free standard shipping is offered on orders over US$150 (or equivalent), and shipping costs for smaller orders are calculated at checkout. PÜRISHH cannot guarantee exact delivery dates because delivery is ultimately the responsibility of the shipping carrier.
Can I subscribe and save on regular purchases?
Can I subscribe and save on regular purchases?
Yes. We offer a subscription program for most of our products. Subscribe and save up to 30 % OFF your first delivery. You can choose delivery intervals (e.g., monthly). Subscriptions auto‑renew, but you may skip or cancel at any time through your account.
Are PÜRISHH products allergen‑free or suitable for special diets?
Are PÜRISHH products allergen‑free or suitable for special diets?
PÜRISHH formulates products without common synthetic additives, but some items may contain potential allergens. The protein powder contains whey (a dairy product) and collagen derived from bovine sources; it is unsuitable for vegans or those with dairy allergies. The Electrolytes formula is gluten‑free, sugar‑free and keto‑friendly. Always review ingredient lists carefully and consult your healthcare provider if you have specific allergies or dietary restrictions.
Where are PÜRISHH products made?
Where are PÜRISHH products made?
PÜRISHH sources ingredients globally, such as New Zealand Wagyu tallow and Himalayan shilajit, but manufactures products in small batches under rigorous quality control. By keeping production small and hands‑on, PÜRISHH can maintain freshness and ensure every batch meets the highest standards.
PÜR Insights
Shilajit vs. Ashwagandha: Two Adaptogens, Two Evidence Bases
Shilajit vs. Ashwagandha: Two Adaptogens, Two Evidence Bases Shilajit and ashwagandha are often mentioned in the same breath. Both come out of Ayurvedic tradition. Both are sold as "adaptogens." And both show up in the same corners of the internet, usually with similar promises about energy, stress, and vitality. Look closer and they have very little in common. One is a plant root. The other is a mineral-rich resin that seeps out of mountain rock. They've been studied for different things, in different people, to very different depths. Their main safety concerns are different too. Comparing them is less like comparing two brands of the same thing and more like comparing two separate research files that happen to sit on the same shelf. This post opens both files. For each one we'll look at what it actually is, what the human trials found and how big those trials were, where the evidence is thin, and what the safety picture looks like. A disclosure first: we sell shilajit, and we don't sell ashwagandha. That gives us a reason to favor one side, so we've tried to hold shilajit to the same standard as ashwagandha. As you'll see, on some measures ashwagandha's evidence base is actually the larger of the two. First, what does "adaptogen" mean? Both products are marketed as adaptogens, so it's worth knowing what that word does and doesn't mean. The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) describes an adaptogen as a compound or product that increases a person's ability to resist, adapt to, or become resilient to stressors. It also notes that this definition is loose. The European Medicines Agency went further. In a 2008 reflection paper on the adaptogenic concept, its herbal medicines committee concluded that "the term is not accepted in pharmacological and clinical terminology that is commonly used in the EU." So "adaptogen" is a traditional and marketing category, not a recognized pharmacological class. Calling two products adaptogens tells you very little about whether they work, or whether they work in the same way. For that, you have to look at each one's evidence directly. What each one actually is Ashwagandha Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) is, in the words of the ODS, an evergreen shrub cultivated in tropical and subtropical areas of Asia, Africa, and Europe. Most commercial supplements contain extracts from the plant's root. Some also include leaf extract, and the ODS notes that the root and leaf differ chemically. Extracts are often standardized to a group of compounds called withanolides. Shilajit Shilajit isn't a plant at all. It's a dark, resin-like substance that forms over long periods as plant material breaks down within rock in high mountain ranges, and it seeps out of cracks in the rock. It's rich in fulvic and humic acids, organic compounds formed as plant matter decomposes, along with a wide range of minerals. That difference matters for how you judge quality. With ashwagandha, the main questions are which plant part was used, what extract it is, and how it's standardized. With shilajit, the questions are whether it's genuine, whether it has been properly purified, and what it contains, including what it shouldn't. Raw shilajit can carry heavy metals and microbial contamination, so purification and testing aren't optional extras. The ashwagandha evidence base Ashwagandha has the larger body of human research of the two. It has been tested in a fair number of randomized controlled trials, and several meta-analyses have pooled those results. Stress and anxiety This is ashwagandha's most-studied area. The ODS summarizes it this way: research suggests ashwagandha extracts may lower stress, anxiety, and cortisol levels. It describes a 2021 review of seven trials with 491 adults, lasting six to eight weeks, which found reduced stress and anxiety compared with placebo. The benefits appeared greater at doses of 500 to 600 milligrams a day than at lower doses. The ODS also notes that a 2022 taskforce of two psychiatric organizations, the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT), provisionally recommended specific daily doses of ashwagandha root extract for generalized anxiety disorder. That recommendation was 300 to 600 milligrams a day of root extract standardized to 5 percent withanolides. The taskforce said stronger recommendations would require more data. Sleep The most cited analysis here is a 2021 meta-analysis by Cheah and colleagues (PLoS ONE, 2021, volume 16, issue 9, article e0257843). They pooled five randomized controlled trials with 400 participants. Their findings: Overall sleep: a small but significant effect, with a standardized mean difference of −0.59 (95 percent CI −0.75 to −0.42). The quality of evidence for this outcome was rated moderate. By population: the effect was larger in adults with diagnosed insomnia (−0.84) than in healthy adults (−0.63). By dose: doses of 600 milligrams a day or more showed a larger effect (−0.69) than lower doses (−0.44). By duration: treatment for eight weeks or longer showed a larger effect (−0.68) than shorter treatment (−0.37). Other outcomes: mental alertness on waking and anxiety also improved. Quality of life showed no significant change. The authors concluded that ashwagandha extract appears to have a beneficial effect on sleep in adults. They added that data on serious adverse effects is limited and that more is needed before judging long-term use. Testosterone and other areas The ODS notes that ashwagandha might also increase testosterone levels. It mentions this mainly as a safety point: for that reason, experts say it might not be safe for men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. It has also been studied for athletic performance and other areas, but stress, anxiety, and sleep are where the research is most developed. The limits of the ashwagandha evidence A larger evidence base isn't the same as a settled one. Several limits are worth knowing. Many different extracts. The ODS lists a long set of branded ashwagandha extracts used in trials and notes that studies have used various preparations, which makes specific recommendations difficult. A result from one extract doesn't automatically transfer to another, or to a generic root powder. Wide dose range. Stress and anxiety trials used anywhere from 240 to 1,250 milligrams a day of extract, and one used 12,000 milligrams a day of whole root granules. Short trials. According to the ODS, trials have lasted from 30 days to 12 weeks, mostly six to 12 weeks. It concludes that ashwagandha appears to be well tolerated for up to about three months, but its long-term safety is not known. The shilajit evidence base Shilajit's human research is much smaller. There are no meta-analyses of shilajit that we're aware of. Instead, there are a small number of randomized trials, each studying a specific outcome in a specific group. Two are worth knowing in detail. Testosterone in middle-aged men A 2016 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Pandit and colleagues (Andrologia, 2016, volume 48, issue 5, pages 570 to 575) gave healthy men aged 45 to 55 either 250 milligrams of purified shilajit twice a day or placebo for 90 days. In the shilajit group, total testosterone rose by about 20 percent over the study, from 398.8 to 474.9 ng/dL. Free testosterone rose by about 19 percent. Two other hormones, LH and FSH, which signal the testes to produce testosterone, stayed stable. That's a real result from a controlled trial. But it's one trial, in one group (healthy men in midlife), with one preparation (purified shilajit). It doesn't tell us what happens in younger men, in women, or with unpurified products. To our knowledge, the testosterone finding hasn't been replicated at a larger scale by independent groups. Strength retention during fatigue A 2019 randomized, placebo-controlled trial by Keller and colleagues at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2019, volume 16, article 3) studied 63 recreationally active men. Over eight weeks, they took 250 milligrams a day of shilajit, 500 milligrams a day, or placebo, and then performed a fatiguing exercise protocol. Among the top half of each group, here's how much maximal strength declined: 500 milligrams a day: 8.9 percent 250 milligrams a day: 17 percent Placebo: 16 percent The 500-milligram group also had significantly lower levels of hydroxyproline in the blood. That's an indirect marker of collagen breakdown. There are three important caveats: Subgroup only. The headline difference appeared in the top half of each group, not across all participants. Indirect marker. Hydroxyproline is a stand-in measure, not a direct measure of tissue health. Manufacturer involvement. The shilajit used was a branded, purified extract supplied by its manufacturer. The limits of the shilajit evidence Put plainly, shilajit's human evidence is: Small: a handful of trials with dozens of participants each, not hundreds or thousands. Narrow: mostly men, and mostly specific outcomes like hormones and fatigue. Dependent on purified preparations: the trials used purified, standardized material, which isn't what every product on the market contains. Not pooled: there's no meta-analysis to show how consistent the findings are. That doesn't make the findings wrong. It means they're early. "Promising, specific, and unreplicated" is the honest description. Side by side What it is Ashwagandha: root (sometimes leaf) extract of a shrub. Shilajit: a mineral-rich resin from mountain rock, high in fulvic acid. Most-studied areas Ashwagandha: stress, anxiety, sleep. Shilajit: testosterone in midlife men, strength retention during fatigue. Size of evidence Ashwagandha: multiple RCTs and several meta-analyses. Shilajit: a few small RCTs and no meta-analyses. Best single summary Ashwagandha: sleep meta-analysis, 5 RCTs and 400 people, small but significant effect, moderate-quality evidence for overall sleep. Shilajit: two individual trials, of 63 men and of men aged 45 to 55. Typical studied doses Ashwagandha: 240 to 1,250 mg/day of extract for stress, and 250 to 600 mg/day for sleep. Shilajit: 250 to 500 mg/day of purified material. Trial length Ashwagandha: mostly 6 to 12 weeks. Shilajit: 8 to 12 weeks. Main quality issue Ashwagandha: many different extracts that aren't interchangeable. Shilajit: authenticity, purification, and contamination. Main safety signals Ashwagandha: rare liver injury reports, possible thyroid effects, pregnancy cautions, and restrictions in some countries. Shilajit: heavy metal and microbial contamination in poorly processed material, and limited formal safety data. Long-term safety Ashwagandha: "not known" beyond about 3 months, according to the ODS. Shilajit: not established. Safety: different risks, not more or less Ashwagandha The ODS says common side effects of ashwagandha are mild: stomach upset, loose stools, nausea, and drowsiness. But it also lists more serious concerns. Liver. There are a few reports of acute liver injury, some in people who had pre-existing liver disease. The ODS notes that product contents weren't independently verified in all cases. Thyroid. Some research suggests ashwagandha might affect thyroid function, and case reports describe thyrotoxicosis, an excess of thyroid hormone. The ODS notes it might interact with thyroid hormone medications. Pregnancy. Some experts advise against ashwagandha during pregnancy. Regulation. According to the ODS, Denmark banned ashwagandha in 2023 following a risk assessment. France's food safety agency, ANSES, issued a 2024 statement recommending against its use in certain groups, including pregnant and breastfeeding women. None of this means ashwagandha is dangerous for most people. In trials, it's generally well tolerated over the short term. But its safety profile has specific, documented flags that anyone considering it should know about. Anyone with a liver or thyroid condition, anyone taking medication, and anyone who is pregnant should talk to a clinician first. Shilajit Shilajit's main risk is in the product itself. Because it's a natural material collected from rock, raw or poorly processed shilajit can contain heavy metals and microbes. That's why purification and batch testing matter so much. It's also why the trials above, which used purified preparations, can't vouch for every jar sold under the same name. Formal safety data on shilajit is limited. The trials were short and small, and they don't add up to a long-term safety record. As with any supplement, anyone who is pregnant, has a medical condition, or takes medication should check with a clinician before using it. What our own batch shows Since we sell shilajit, here's what our current batch's certificate of analysis reports. This certificate comes through our supplier's lab, not a lab we commissioned directly. We say that every time we share it, so you can weigh it accordingly. Fulvic and humic acid Fulvic acid: 72 percent Humic acid: 8.3 percent Heavy metals (result vs. permitted level, mg/kg) Lead: 0.67, against a permitted level of 6 Cadmium: 0.12, against 1 Arsenic: 0.08, against 12 Mercury: below 0.01, against 1 Microbes and authenticity Pathogenic bacteria, including salmonella: absent Authenticity test result: "Authentic" These numbers tell you about purity and composition. They don't tell you our shilajit will reproduce the trial results above, because those trials used a specific purified preparation, and nobody has tested ours against it head to head. Can you take them together? We're not aware of good-quality trials testing shilajit and ashwagandha together. So we can't say whether combining them helps, or whether it changes the safety picture. Ashwagandha's possible effects on thyroid function and hormones, and the general lack of long-term data on both, are good reasons to talk to a clinician before stacking them, especially if you take any medication. How to think about choosing This isn't medical advice, but the evidence points to a few sensible principles. Match the product to the evidence, not the label. "Adaptogen" doesn't tell you what something does. Ashwagandha's research centers on stress, anxiety, and sleep. Shilajit's centers on a narrow set of outcomes in men, such as testosterone in midlife and strength retention under fatigue. If your goal doesn't match either evidence base, neither product has good evidence for it. Check what was actually studied. With ashwagandha, look for the plant part, the extract, the withanolide standardization, and the dose, and compare them with the trials. With shilajit, look for evidence of purification, a fulvic acid figure, and a batch-specific heavy metal panel with actual numbers rather than just "pass." Respect the time limits. Most trials of both lasted three months or less. Long-term safety isn't established for either. Know the specific safety flags. For ashwagandha: liver, thyroid, pregnancy, and hormone-sensitive conditions. For shilajit: contamination and authenticity. The honest summary Shilajit and ashwagandha share a label, "adaptogen," that the European Medicines Agency doesn't accept as a pharmacological term. Beyond that label, they're different substances with different evidence bases. Ashwagandha is a root extract with the larger body of research. A meta-analysis of five trials and 400 people found a small but significant improvement in sleep, larger at 600 milligrams a day or more and over at least eight weeks. Reviews also suggest reduced stress and anxiety. But trials used many different extracts, rarely lasted past 12 weeks, and the safety profile includes rare liver injury reports, possible thyroid effects, and regulatory restrictions in some European countries. Shilajit is a mineral-rich resin with a much smaller research base. A 90-day trial in men aged 45 to 55 found about a 20 percent rise in total testosterone. An eight-week trial in 63 men found better strength retention under fatigue at 500 milligrams a day, in the top half of each group. Both used purified preparations, neither has been replicated at scale, and the main risk lies in the quality of the product itself. If you're considering either, start with what you actually want, check whether the research matches it, look for proof of what's in the product, and talk to a clinician if you have a health condition or take medication. References NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Ashwagandha: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. European Medicines Agency, Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products. Reflection paper on the adaptogenic concept. EMEA/HMPC/102655/2007. Adopted 8 May 2008. Cheah KL, Norhayati MN, Husniati Yaacob L, Abdul Rahman R. Effect of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) extract on sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257843 Pandit S, Biswas S, Jana U, De RK, Mukhopadhyay SC, Biswas TK. Clinical evaluation of purified Shilajit on testosterone levels in healthy volunteers. Andrologia. 2016;48(5):570-575. doi:10.1111/and.12482 Keller JL, Housh TJ, Hill EC, Smith CM, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. The effects of Shilajit supplementation on fatigue-induced decreases in muscular strength and serum hydroxyproline levels. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2019;16:3. doi:10.1186/s12970-019-0270-2 These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Learn more
Magnesium vs. Melatonin for Sleep: How They Actually Differ
Magnesium vs. Melatonin for Sleep: How They Actually Differ If you've ever stood in a pharmacy at 11 p.m. looking for something to help you sleep, you've probably narrowed it down to two bottles: melatonin and magnesium. They often sit on the same shelf, they're both marketed for sleep, and online they're constantly compared as if they were two versions of the same thing. They aren't. Melatonin is a hormone your brain uses to tell your body what time it is. Magnesium is a mineral your body needs for hundreds of basic processes, sleep-related ones among them. They work through completely different routes. They've been studied in different ways, for different problems. And the evidence behind each is more modest than most marketing suggests. This post compares them side by side: what each one is, what the research actually shows, how big the effects are, what the safety and quality issues look like, and who might reasonably consider which. One disclosure first. We sell a magnesium supplement, and we don't sell melatonin. So we have a stake in one side of this comparison, and you should weigh what we say with that in mind. We've tried to be as hard on magnesium's evidence as on melatonin's. Two different kinds of thing The most useful way to understand the difference is to start with what each substance does in your body before any supplement is involved. Melatonin: a timing signal Melatonin is a hormone made in the brain. As the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) puts it, melatonin is a hormone that your brain produces in response to darkness, and being exposed to light at night can block its production. That tells you its job. Melatonin is less a sedative than a messenger. Its rise in the evening is part of how your body knows night has arrived. It's part of your circadian system, the internal clock that times sleepiness, alertness, body temperature, and many other daily rhythms. When you take melatonin as a supplement, you're adding to that signal. That's why it's most often discussed for problems of timing: jet lag, for example, where your internal clock and the local clock disagree. Magnesium: a nutrient Magnesium is a mineral. According to the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, it's a cofactor in more than 300 enzyme systems, involved in everything from energy production to muscle and nerve function. You get it from food: leafy greens, nuts, seeds, legumes, whole grains, and some in meat and dairy. Magnesium isn't a timing signal, and it doesn't tell your body it's night. Its possible role in sleep is more indirect. Researchers have proposed several mechanisms involving the nervous system, but the human evidence connecting those mechanisms to better sleep is limited. The most realistic way to think about magnesium is as a nutrient. If your intake is low, correcting it might help with a range of things, possibly including sleep. If your intake is already adequate, there's much less reason to expect a supplement to change anything. So the first difference is fundamental. Melatonin is a signal that can shift when your body feels ready for sleep. Magnesium is a nutrient that might matter if you aren't getting enough of it. Neither is a sleeping pill. What the research shows for melatonin Melatonin has the larger body of research of the two, so we'll start there. For general sleep problems The most widely cited meta-analysis is by Ferracioli-Oda, Qawasmi, and Bloch (PLoS ONE, 2013, volume 8, issue 5, article e63773). They pooled 19 studies with 1,683 participants with primary sleep disorders and compared melatonin with placebo. They found: Time to fall asleep: reduced by an average of 7.06 minutes (95 percent confidence interval 4.37 to 9.75 minutes). Total sleep time: increased by an average of 8.25 minutes (95 percent CI 1.74 to 14.75 minutes). Overall sleep quality: improved, with a standardized mean difference of 0.22 (95 percent CI 0.12 to 0.32), which is a small effect. The authors described these effects as modest. They noted that the benefit was smaller than that of prescription sleep medications, but that melatonin's favorable side-effect profile might still give it a role. Seven minutes is real, but it's worth pausing on how small that is. If it usually takes you 40 minutes to fall asleep, melatonin might, on average, make it 33. For chronic insomnia specifically The American Academy of Sleep Medicine's clinical practice guideline on drug treatment for chronic insomnia in adults (Sateia and colleagues, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2017, volume 13, issue 2, pages 307 to 349) looked at melatonin as one of many options. Based on trials of 2-milligram doses, it reported that melatonin reduced the time to fall asleep by an average of 9 minutes more than placebo (95 percent CI 2 to 15 minutes), measured in a sleep lab. The guideline's recommendation was: "We suggest that clinicians not use melatonin as a treatment for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia." It was graded as a weak recommendation, meaning the panel was uncertain rather than confident that melatonin doesn't help. But it's a meaningful signal that the leading US sleep medicine body didn't endorse it for chronic insomnia. NCCIH's summary agrees in tone. It says there's not enough strong evidence on the effectiveness or safety of melatonin supplementation for chronic insomnia. It also notes that guidelines recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as the initial treatment. For jet lag and timing problems This is where melatonin's role as a timing signal makes the most sense. NCCIH says research suggests melatonin supplements may help with jet lag. Small studies found benefits after both eastward and westward flights, though NCCIH notes the evidence is limited. For delayed sleep-wake phase disorder, a condition where someone's internal clock runs late, NCCIH describes a 2018 trial that used melatonin taken one hour before the desired bedtime, combined with a set bedtime. On shift work, NCCIH says studies on whether melatonin helps shift workers were generally small or inconclusive. The pattern across all of this: melatonin's best-supported uses are about shifting timing, and its effect on general sleeplessness is small. What the research shows for magnesium Magnesium's sleep research is much thinner, and we want to be precise about it. The best summary we have The most directly relevant analysis is a systematic review and meta-analysis by Mah and Pitre (BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 2021, volume 21, article 125). They searched for randomized trials of oral magnesium for insomnia in older adults. They found only three trials, with 151 participants in total across three countries. Comparing magnesium with placebo: Time to fall asleep: 17.36 minutes shorter after magnesium than placebo (95 percent CI 7.44 to 27.27 minutes shorter). Total sleep time: 16.06 minutes longer, but this was not statistically significant (95 percent CI ranged from 5.99 minutes shorter to 38.12 minutes longer). On paper, a 17-minute improvement in falling asleep is larger than melatonin's 7 minutes. But the authors themselves are clear about how much weight it can bear: Evidence quality: they rated it low to very low. Risk of bias: all included trials were at moderate to high risk of bias. Their conclusion: "the quality of literature is substandard for physicians to make well-informed recommendations." They did say the trial evidence may support oral magnesium for insomnia symptoms, given its low cost and broad safety. But with three small trials, you should treat the 17-minute figure as a hint, not a measurement. There are also limits on who the results apply to. The review focused on older adults, so we can't assume the same effect in younger people. And it can't tell us whether the people who benefited were low in magnesium to begin with, which may be the most important question of all. Why baseline intake probably matters Because magnesium is a nutrient, the most plausible case for a supplement is someone who isn't getting enough from food. That's not a rare situation. According to the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, national survey data from 2013 to 2016 showed that 48 percent of Americans of all ages consume less magnesium from food and beverages than their Estimated Average Requirement. Men aged 71 and older and adolescents were most likely to have low intakes. The Recommended Dietary Allowances for adults are: Age Men Women 19 to 30 400 mg/day 310 mg/day 31 and older 420 mg/day 320 mg/day If your diet regularly falls short of those numbers, a supplement is filling a real gap, and it's reasonable to think sleep could be one of the things that benefits. If your diet already covers it, the research doesn't give strong reason to expect more magnesium to improve your sleep further. Side by side Putting the evidence together: What it is Melatonin: a hormone that signals darkness and helps time the sleep-wake cycle. Magnesium: a mineral nutrient, a cofactor in more than 300 enzyme systems. Best-supported use Melatonin: shifting timing, such as jet lag. Evidence is limited, but it's the most consistent. Magnesium: correcting low intake. Its direct sleep evidence is weak. Effect on time to fall asleep Melatonin: about 7 minutes in a 19-study meta-analysis, and 9 minutes in the AASM's review of 2-milligram trials. Magnesium: about 17 minutes in a 3-trial meta-analysis in older adults, rated low to very low quality. What the major guidance says Melatonin: the AASM suggests clinicians not use it for chronic insomnia (a weak recommendation). Magnesium: no major sleep guideline recommendation. Timing Melatonin: timing matters, because it acts on the body clock. Magnesium: not well studied. Trials used daily dosing. Biggest practical concerns Melatonin: label accuracy, limited long-term safety data, and accidental ingestion by children. Magnesium: digestive side effects at higher supplemental doses, and an upper limit on supplemental intake. Quality and safety: where they differ most Effect sizes aside, the bigger practical differences between these two show up in quality control and safety. Melatonin: the label may not match the bottle In the US, melatonin is sold as a dietary supplement. NCCIH notes that in several other countries it's available only with a prescription and is considered a drug. That regulatory difference shows up in product quality. A study by Erland and Saxena at the University of Guelph (Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2017, volume 13, issue 2, pages 275 to 281) tested roughly 30 melatonin supplements from 16 brands. They found: Accuracy: 71 percent did not contain within 10 percent of the amount on the label. Range: actual content ran from 83 percent less than labeled to nearly five times more. Serotonin: about one in four products contained serotonin that wasn't on the label. A 2023 research letter in JAMA by Cohen and colleagues looked at melatonin gummies sold in the US. Of 25 products, 22 (88 percent) were inaccurately labeled. Only 3 were within 10 percent of the declared amount. Actual melatonin content ranged from 74 percent to 347 percent of the labeled quantity. So with melatonin, the dose you think you're taking may not be the dose you're actually taking. That matters more for a hormone, where timing and amount are the whole point. Melatonin: children and safe storage A CDC report (Lelak and colleagues, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2022, volume 71, pages 725 to 729) tracked melatonin ingestions by people aged 19 and under reported to US poison centers. It found: Total reports: 260,435 from 2012 to 2021. Rise: a 530 percent increase in annual reports over that decade, from 8,337 in 2012 to 52,563 in 2021. Serious outcomes: 4,097 children were hospitalized, and 287 needed intensive care. The CDC recommended that health care providers advise parents on the safe storage and appropriate use of melatonin, and that child-resistant packaging be considered. Gummies that look and taste like candy are an obvious part of the risk. If you keep melatonin at home, store it like a medicine. Melatonin: side effects and long-term data NCCIH lists headache, dizziness, nausea, and sleepiness as reported short-term side effects in adults. It also notes that information on the long-term safety of melatonin supplementation is lacking. For short-term, occasional use such as jet lag, that's less of a concern. For nightly use over months or years, it's an honest gap in what we know. Magnesium: digestive effects and an upper limit Magnesium's main safety issues are different and better defined. The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements sets a Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 350 milligrams per day for adults. This applies only to magnesium from supplements and medications, not from food. The most common side effect of high supplemental doses is diarrhea, often with nausea and abdominal cramping. Some forms of magnesium are more likely to cause this than others, which is part of why the form on the label matters. Serious magnesium toxicity is rare and has generally involved very large doses, typically above 5,000 milligrams a day from laxatives and antacids. Anyone with kidney problems, or anyone taking medications, should talk to a clinician before starting any magnesium supplement. Quality control applies to magnesium too. Any supplement can be mislabeled or contaminated, which is why we publish test results for ours. Our magnesium certificate of analysis comes through our supplier's lab rather than a lab we commissioned directly, and we say so wherever we share it. Can you take both? People ask this a lot. The honest answer is that we're not aware of good-quality trials testing magnesium and melatonin together for sleep. So we can't tell you that combining them works better than either alone. What we can say is that they don't do the same thing, so they aren't redundant in principle. One is a timing signal and the other is a nutrient. But "not redundant" is not the same as "proven to work together." If you're considering combining sleep supplements, especially alongside any medication, that's a conversation worth having with a clinician or pharmacist. Who might reasonably consider which Based on the evidence above, here's how we'd think about it. This isn't medical advice, and persistent sleep problems deserve a proper evaluation. If your problem is timing (jet lag, or a body clock that runs late), melatonin is the more logical candidate. NCCIH says research suggests it may help with jet lag, and timing problems are where its mechanism fits. Timing of the dose matters. Given the label accuracy issues, choosing a product with third-party verification makes sense. If you have chronic insomnia, neither supplement is the first-line answer. The AASM suggests clinicians not use melatonin for chronic insomnia. Magnesium's evidence is low quality. NCCIH notes that guidelines recommend CBT-I as the initial treatment. That's worth knowing before spending months cycling through supplements. If your diet is low in magnesium, a supplement may correct a real shortfall. Almost half of Americans don't meet the Estimated Average Requirement from food alone. Sleep might be one of the benefits, though that hasn't been firmly established. Eating more magnesium-rich foods is an equally valid route. If your diet already covers magnesium, there's little evidence that more will improve your sleep. If you have kids at home, store melatonin out of reach and treat it as you would a medicine. What neither one fixes It's worth ending where most sleep advice should start. A supplement that, at best, shortens the time to fall asleep by somewhere between 7 and 17 minutes is working at the margins. The big levers are things neither bottle can provide: a consistent sleep and wake time light in the morning and darkness at night (bright light at night can block melatonin production) caffeine kept well away from bedtime a cool, dark room for persistent insomnia, proper evaluation and CBT-I Those cost nothing and tend to matter more than any capsule. The honest summary Magnesium and melatonin are both sold for sleep, but they're different kinds of substances doing different jobs. Melatonin is a hormone that signals darkness and helps time your sleep-wake cycle. In a meta-analysis of 19 studies, it shortened the time to fall asleep by about 7 minutes and added about 8 minutes of total sleep. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine suggests clinicians not use it for chronic insomnia. Its most sensible use is for timing problems like jet lag. Its biggest practical issues are label accuracy (in one study, 71 percent of products missed their label by more than 10 percent), limited long-term safety data, and a steep rise in accidental ingestion by children. Magnesium is a nutrient that almost half of Americans don't get enough of from food. A meta-analysis of three small trials in older adults found it shortened the time to fall asleep by about 17 minutes, but the evidence was rated low to very low quality. Its clearest case is correcting low intake. Its main safety issues are digestive effects and a 350-milligram upper limit for supplemental intake. If your sleep problem is about timing, melatonin is the more logical tool. If your diet is low in magnesium, fixing that is worthwhile in its own right. And if your sleep problem is persistent, the most effective answer probably isn't in either bottle. References National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Melatonin: What You Need To Know. National Institutes of Health. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Magnesium: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. Ferracioli-Oda E, Qawasmi A, Bloch MH. Meta-analysis: melatonin for the treatment of primary sleep disorders. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063773 Sateia MJ, Buysse DJ, Krystal AD, Neubauer DN, Heald JL. Clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic treatment of chronic insomnia in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2017;13(2):307-349. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6470 Mah J, Pitre T. Oral magnesium supplementation for insomnia in older adults: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2021;21:125. doi:10.1186/s12906-021-03297-z Erland LAE, Saxena PK. Melatonin natural health products and supplements: presence of serotonin and significant variability of melatonin content. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2017;13(2):275-281. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6462 Cohen PA, Avula B, Wang YH, Katragunta K, Khan I. Quantity of melatonin and CBD in melatonin gummies sold in the US. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1401-1402. Lelak K, Vohra V, Neuman MI, Toce MS, Sethuraman U. Pediatric melatonin ingestions: United States, 2012–2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2022;71(22):725-729. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7122a1 These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Learn more
Electrolyte Drink Mix vs. Sports Drinks: Reading the Label
Electrolyte Drink Mix vs. Sports Drinks: Reading the Label Pick up a bottled sports drink and a packet of electrolyte powder and turn them both around. The labels look similar enough: a serving size, some sodium, a little potassium, maybe some sugar. But the two products are usually built for different jobs, and the numbers on the back tell you which job each one is built for, if you know how to read them. Most people don't read them. They pick based on the front of the package, which says things like "hydration," "replenish," or "clean electrolytes." None of those words have a set meaning. The back of the package is where the real information is. This post walks through that label line by line: serving size, sodium, potassium, sugar, magnesium, and the marketing language around them. Along the way we'll set each number against what the major position statements actually recommend. By the end you should be able to look at any hydration product and work out, in a minute or two, whether it fits what you're doing. A disclosure up front: we sell an electrolyte drink mix, and we don't sell a sports drink. Keep that in mind as you read. We'll point out where a traditional sports drink is the better tool, because sometimes it is. First, what each product is actually for The terms get used loosely, so it helps to define them by what they contain rather than what they're called. A traditional sports drink is a carbohydrate-electrolyte drink. It combines water, sugar, and a moderate amount of sodium, with a little potassium. It's designed to do three things at once during exercise: replace fluid, replace some of the sodium lost in sweat, and supply carbohydrate as fuel. An electrolyte drink mix, in the way the term is usually used now, is a powder or tablet you add to water. Many of these put more emphasis on sodium and other minerals and contain little or no sugar. They're designed mainly to replace minerals, not to fuel. Neither design is better in general. Each one suits a different situation, and the label tells you which one you're holding. Step 1: Normalize the serving size Before comparing anything, get both products onto the same scale. This is the step most people skip, and it's where most label confusion starts. A bottled drink might list nutrition per bottle or per a fraction of a bottle. A powder lists nutrition per scoop or per stick, but the amount of water you mix it into is up to you. A powder with 500 milligrams of sodium mixed into 500 milliliters of water is twice as concentrated as the same scoop mixed into a liter. The cleanest way to compare is to convert everything to milligrams per liter. Research papers usually report electrolyte concentrations in millimoles per liter (mmol/L), so it also helps to know the conversions: 1 mmol of sodium = 23 milligrams 1 mmol of potassium = about 39 milligrams So a drink described in a study as containing 21 mmol/L of sodium has about 483 milligrams of sodium per liter. Once you do this conversion, published research and the label on your shelf start speaking the same language. Step 2: Sodium, the number that matters most When it comes to electrolytes during exercise, the major position statements focus their guidance on sodium. It's the mineral sweat carries away in the largest amounts that matter for exercise. How much sodium is in sweat? It varies a lot from person to person. The National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement on fluid replacement (McDermott and colleagues, Journal of Athletic Training, 2017, volume 52, issue 9, pages 877 to 895) gives a range for sweat sodium of 10 to 100 mEq/L. For sodium, that's the same as mmol/L, so it works out to roughly 230 to 2,300 milligrams of sodium per liter of sweat. That's a tenfold spread between individuals. The joint position statement on nutrition and athletic performance from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine (Thomas, Erdman, and Burke, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2016, volume 48, issue 3, pages 543 to 568) puts the average at about 50 mmol/L, or roughly 1 gram per liter, while noting the wide variation. It recommends that sodium be taken during exercise when large sweat sodium losses occur. It specifically mentions: athletes with high sweat rates athletes with salty sweat prolonged exercise of more than two hours Now compare that with a typical sports drink. In a well-known 2016 study we'll come back to below, the sports drink tested contained 21 mmol/L of sodium, about 483 milligrams per liter. The 2015 international consensus statement on exercise-associated hyponatremia (Hew-Butler and colleagues, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2015, volume 25, issue 4, pages 303 to 320) describes sports drinks as generally containing roughly 10 to 38 mmol/L of sodium, or about 230 to 874 milligrams per liter. The takeaway: a conventional sports drink usually contains less sodium per liter than the average person's sweat does. For a short or moderate session, that doesn't matter. For a long, hot session in someone who sweats heavily or sweats salty, it can mean a drink replaces fluid faster than it replaces sodium. This is the main gap that higher-sodium electrolyte mixes are designed to fill. When you read a label, the sodium number per liter, set against your own situation, is the first thing to check. A quick way to estimate your own needs The NATA statement recommends that physically active people weigh themselves before and after exercise to check how much fluid they've lost. It also says losses should be limited to 2 percent of body mass or less. A rough version anyone can do: weigh yourself before and after a typical session, accounting for anything you drank. Each kilogram lost is roughly a liter of sweat. If you lose about a liter in an hour and your sweat is near the average concentration, you've lost something on the order of 1 gram of sodium in that hour. If you notice white, salty streaks on your clothes or skin after training, you may be at the saltier end of the range. This isn't a lab test, but it turns a vague idea ("I sweat a lot") into a number you can compare against a label. Step 3: Sugar, which is a feature or a bug depending on the job Sugar is where sports drinks and electrolyte mixes differ most, and it's also where most of the online arguments happen. The honest answer is that carbohydrate in a drink is useful in some situations and unnecessary in others. When carbohydrate helps. The joint position statement gives clear guidance on carbohydrate during exercise by duration: Under 45 minutes: not needed. 45 to 75 minutes: small amounts, including a mouth rinse. 1 to 2.5 hours: 30 to 60 grams per hour. More than 2.5 to 3 hours: up to 90 grams per hour. For long sessions, a carbohydrate-electrolyte drink is one of the most convenient ways to hit those targets, because it delivers fuel and fluid at the same time. This is where traditional sports drinks earn their place. There's also an absorption angle. The NATA statement notes that the optimal carbohydrate concentration for fluid absorption is between 3 and 8 percent, and that concentrations above 5 to 8 percent may slow absorption. A 6 percent drink contains 60 grams of carbohydrate per liter. In a standard 20-ounce bottle (about 590 milliliters), that's roughly 35 grams. When carbohydrate is just sugar. The same guidance tells you carbohydrate isn't needed for sessions under 45 minutes. And if you're not exercising at all, sugar in a drink is simply added sugar. For context, the FDA's Daily Value for added sugars is 50 grams. A single bottled sports drink can account for a large share of that. So on the label, the question is simple. Look at the total carbohydrate and added sugars per serving, and ask whether you're doing something long enough and hard enough to use that fuel. If you are, the sugar is the point. If you aren't, it's a cost with no benefit. One more thing about sugar-free mixes. If a mix contains little or no carbohydrate, it isn't fueling you. That's fine for daily use, short sessions, or people eating low-carb. But for a two-hour ride or run, you'll need carbohydrate from somewhere else, whether that's food or a separate fuel source, if you want to follow the position stand guidance. Step 4: The "more hydrating than water" question Many hydration products imply they hydrate you better than water. There's actually a good study on this, and the results are more nuanced than most marketing suggests. Maughan and colleagues (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2016, volume 103, pages 717 to 723) developed what they called a beverage hydration index. They gave 72 healthy, active men a liter of different drinks over 30 minutes while at rest, then tracked how much urine they produced over the following four hours. A drink that led to less urine was being retained better. They tested still water against 12 other drinks, including: sparkling water cola and diet cola a sports drink an oral rehydration solution orange juice lager coffee and tea full-fat and skimmed milk The results: Better retained than water at two hours: full-fat milk, skimmed milk, the oral rehydration solution, and orange juice. No different from water: the sports drink. Total urine output over four hours after drinking it was no different from water. The composition of those two electrolyte drinks is telling: Sodium Potassium Oral rehydration solution 55 mmol/L (about 1,265 mg per liter) 20 mmol/L Sports drink 21 mmol/L (about 483 mg per liter) 4 mmol/L The drink with substantially more sodium and potassium was retained better than water. The sports drink, with less sodium, was not. Two cautions keep this from being overstated. First, this was a resting study in men, not a study of exercise or performance. Second, retaining a drink better over a few hours isn't the same as it being healthier to drink all day. But it does suggest that, at rest, an ordinary sports drink doesn't hydrate you more effectively than water, and that sodium content appears to be part of what makes a drink better retained. Step 5: Potassium and magnesium, the supporting cast Potassium and magnesium appear on most electrolyte labels, and it's worth knowing how to read those numbers in context. The FDA Daily Values give a useful reference: Sodium: 2,300 milligrams Chloride: 2,300 milligrams Potassium: 4,700 milligrams Magnesium: 420 milligrams When a label lists a percent Daily Value next to each mineral, that percentage is calculated against these numbers. In the Maughan study, the sports drink contained 4 mmol/L of potassium, roughly 156 milligrams per liter. That's a small fraction of the 4,700-milligram Daily Value. That isn't necessarily a flaw, because a drink isn't meant to be your main potassium source. Fruits, vegetables, meat, and dairy are where most potassium comes from. But it's worth knowing that the potassium in a typical hydration product is a modest contribution, not a full day's supply. For magnesium, look at two things: the amount, and the form. Labels usually name the compound, such as magnesium citrate, glycinate, or malate. The amount listed is normally the elemental magnesium, which is the figure you compare against the 420-milligram Daily Value. If magnesium is only named inside a blend without an amount, you can't tell how much you're getting. Step 6: Supplement Facts vs. Nutrition Facts You'll notice that some hydration products have a Nutrition Facts panel and others have a Supplement Facts panel. Bottled sports drinks are typically sold as conventional beverages with Nutrition Facts. Many electrolyte powders and tablets are sold as dietary supplements with Supplement Facts. Both panels list amounts and percent Daily Values for the minerals, and the FDA uses the same Daily Values for both. The practical difference for you is that a Supplement Facts panel can list ingredients inside a proprietary blend. A blend shows a total weight for the group but not the amount of each ingredient in it. For an electrolyte product, that matters. You can't check sodium against your sweat losses, or magnesium against the Daily Value, if the amounts are hidden inside a blend. A product that lists each mineral individually, in milligrams, is simply easier to evaluate. Step 7: Reading the marketing language The front of the package uses words with no fixed definition, so the back of the package has to do the work. "Hydration" or "advanced hydration." These words don't tell you anything measurable. Check the sodium per liter and the sugar per serving instead. "Trace minerals." Many electrolyte products, including ours, use mineral-rich salts like Himalayan or other pink salts as the sodium source. It's worth being honest about what that does and doesn't mean. A 2020 study by Fayet-Moore and colleagues (Foods, 2020, volume 9, issue 10, article 1490) analyzed 31 samples of pink salt sold in Australia. They found that, apart from sodium, the minerals in pink salt did not meaningfully contribute to nutrient intake. More than 30 grams a day, about six teaspoons, would be needed to make any meaningful contribution. That's an amount of salt far beyond any sensible sodium intake. The pink salt samples averaged somewhat less sodium than the white table salt control (about 395,000 versus 428,000 milligrams per kilogram), but the authors didn't consider that difference meaningful at normal amounts. So the honest way to describe a pink-salt-based electrolyte is this: it's a sodium source. Any trace minerals are along for the ride in amounts too small to matter. We don't claim our electrolytes deliver meaningful trace minerals, and we'd be skeptical of any product that does. Testing matters more than the salt's origin. The same study found one pink salt sample, from Peru, with lead at 2.59 milligrams per kilogram. That's above the 2 milligram per kilogram maximum set by Food Standards Australia New Zealand. No other sample exceeded the limits for arsenic, cadmium, or mercury. The lesson isn't that pink salt is dangerous. It's that any mined mineral ingredient should be tested. For our own electrolytes, both flavors were tested separately for heavy metals: Lemon-lime: 0.051 parts per million lead, 0.024 arsenic, 0.003 cadmium, and 0.005 mercury. Raspberry: 0.095 lead, 0.029 arsenic, 0.004 cadmium, and 0.002 mercury. What we haven't yet done is independently verify the exact milligram amounts of sodium, potassium, and magnesium in the finished product. The mineral amounts on our label come from the formulation, and we'll say so clearly until that testing is complete. The safety point most labels don't mention There's one important thing that no amount of sodium on a label can fix: drinking too much. Exercise-associated hyponatremia is a dangerous drop in blood sodium during or after exercise. The 2015 international consensus statement is direct about its main cause. It names the overconsumption of hypotonic fluids relative to the body's exchangeable sodium as the primary cause. It also notes that all sports beverages are hypotonic to plasma, meaning they contain less sodium than your blood, which sits at around 140 mmol/L. And it states that sodium supplementation cannot prevent hyponatremia when someone keeps drinking excessive amounts. In other words, a higher-sodium drink is not a license to drink without limit. The consensus statement recommends using thirst to guide fluid intake as a strategy that should limit drinking in excess. The NATA statement's advice to weigh yourself before and after exercise helps here too. Gaining weight over a session is a sign you've drunk more than you lost. The other side: sodium in everyday life Higher-sodium mixes make sense for heavy sweaters and long sessions. But they're often marketed for daily use by everyone, so it's worth putting sodium in context. According to the FDA, Americans eat on average about 3,400 milligrams of sodium a day. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that adults limit sodium to less than 2,300 milligrams a day. The FDA also notes that over 70 percent of dietary sodium comes from packaged and prepared foods. For someone eating a typical diet and not sweating much, a daily high-sodium drink adds to an intake that's likely already above the guideline. For someone who eats mostly unprocessed food, trains hard, sweats heavily, or eats low-carb, the picture can look quite different. We covered this in more detail in our post on whether you need electrolytes every day. The label is the same in both cases. What changes is whether its sodium is filling a gap or adding to a surplus. Putting it together: which one, when Here's how the evidence above translates into practical choices. Exercise under about an hour. The NATA statement says activity lasting less than an hour should require nothing other than water. Neither product is necessary for most people. Hard sessions of 1 to 2.5 hours. The joint statement recommends 30 to 60 grams of carbohydrate per hour here. A traditional sports drink is a convenient way to get carbohydrate and fluid together. An electrolyte mix works too if you get carbohydrate from food. Long sessions, heat, heavy or salty sweating. This is where the sodium gap matters. The joint statement recommends sodium during exercise when large sweat sodium losses occur. A higher-sodium mix, or a sports drink with extra sodium from food or another source, makes sense. Carbohydrate needs rise too, up to 90 grams per hour beyond about 2.5 hours. Daily life, low activity. Water is usually enough. A sports drink mostly adds sugar. A high-sodium mix mostly adds sodium to a diet that probably already has plenty. Low-carb or fasting. A sugar-free electrolyte mix can make sense here, since these eating patterns can change how the body handles sodium. We've covered why in an earlier post. Your 60-second label checklist When you pick up any hydration product, check these in order: Serving size. How much water is the serving meant for? Convert to per liter if you're comparing. Sodium per liter. Compare it with sweat sodium, roughly 230 to 2,300 milligrams per liter with an average around 1 gram. Is it enough for your sessions, or more than your day needs? Total carbohydrate and added sugars. Are you doing something long enough to use the fuel? If not, how much of the 50-gram added sugars Daily Value does it use? Potassium and magnesium. Are amounts listed individually in milligrams, and how do they compare with the Daily Values? Proprietary blends. Are any minerals hidden inside a blend without individual amounts? Testing. Does the company show third-party test results, especially for heavy metals if the product uses mined salts? Front-of-pack claims. Ignore "hydration," "advanced," and "trace minerals" until the numbers on the back back them up. The honest summary Sports drinks and electrolyte mixes aren't rivals so much as tools for different jobs. A traditional sports drink is a carbohydrate-electrolyte drink. Its sugar is genuinely useful during long, hard sessions, where position statements recommend 30 to 60 grams of carbohydrate an hour or more. Its sodium is usually modest, often less per liter than average sweat. At rest, a well-designed study found it hydrated no better than water. A high-sodium electrolyte mix fills the sodium gap for heavy or salty sweaters and long sessions. It usually doesn't provide fuel. For people who aren't sweating much, it may just add sodium to a diet already above the guideline. Neither one protects you from drinking too much, and neither one's front label tells you much. The back label does. Convert to milligrams per liter, check sodium against what you're losing, check sugar against what you're doing, and look for individual amounts and real testing. That takes about a minute, and it's the difference between buying a product that fits your day and buying a marketing promise. References McDermott BP, Anderson SA, Armstrong LE, Casa DJ, Cheuvront SN, Cooper L, Kenney WL, O'Connor FG, Roberts WO. National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: fluid replacement for the physically active. Journal of Athletic Training. 2017;52(9):877-895. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-52.9.02 Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2016;48(3):543-568. (Published concurrently in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.) Hew-Butler T, Rosner MH, Fowkes-Godek S, et al. Statement of the Third International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference, Carlsbad, California, 2015. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2015;25(4):303-320. Maughan RJ, Watson P, Cordery PAA, Walsh NP, Oliver SJ, Dolci A, Rodriguez-Sanchez N, Galloway SDR. A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016;103(3):717-723. doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.114769 Fayet-Moore F, Wibisono C, Carr P, Duve E, Petocz P, Lancaster G, McMillan J, Marshall S, Blumfield M. An analysis of the mineral composition of pink salt available in Australia. Foods. 2020;9(10):1490. doi:10.3390/foods9101490 US Food and Drug Administration. Daily Value on the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels. US Food and Drug Administration. Sodium in Your Diet. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Learn more