SHOP BEST SELLERS
Shop our best selling products
Type: Performance Supplements
Protein Powder
Type: Performance Supplements
Electrolytes - Stick Packs
Type: Performance Supplements
Electrolytes
Type: Performance Supplements
Creatine Monohydrate
Type: Core Supplements
Source Magnesium
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Elements Shampoo
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Elements Conditioner
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Elements Tallow Soap (Lemongrass)
Type: Performance Supplements
Raw Honey
Type: Body Essentials
Raw Tallow Sun Balm
★★★★★ 1,000+ 5 Star Reviews
Pure ingredients
Raw ingredients. Ancient wisdom. Modern results. Every product contains only what nature intended:
- Grass-fed tallow rich in bioavailable nutrients
- Raw honey and adaptogenic herbs in their purest form
- Regeneratively sourced proteins, never denatured
- Zero synthetic additives or lab-made fillers
Small-batch wellness our ancestors would recognize. Because when you honor nature's integrity, your body knows the difference.
Purely Natural, Perfectly You
Let customers speak for us
5 stars
I love the way this tallow soap makes my hands feel! Just make sure you shake it before use because it does separate. It smells wonderful, very light scent and the tallow has made my hands feel softer then ever before.
I've been taking now supplements vitamin d and my blood results still show that my Vitamin D levels are low. I saw an ad for this brand and decided to try it. I just had my blood work done again and for the first time ever, my Vitamin D was in the green marker. Very happy!
I literally can't drink water without these electrolytes now. I'm not kidding. You guys killed it with this product. I take both flavors to mix and match sometimes :) I hate the taste of other electrolytes. These taste natural and very light on the flavor, which I love. Please don't ever get rid of this product!!!
This is the only protein powder I have ever taken that digests easily for me. I always struggle with bloat after a protein shake. I tried both but I LOVE THE CHOCOLATE.
Honestly love the taste of this honey. I've been buying the orange blossom for months but the saw palmetto is something else. I definitely recommend it!
Clean, great taste and doesn't leave me bloated. I finally can take protein shakes every day. I tried so many different brands, but every time I drank them I felt like puking. Can't wait to try the chocolate protein
Clean and like the moisture
I love this product. it helps to give me energy.
Trust this product! We’ve been deceived by so many products labeled CLEAN but these guys put their money where their mouth is. Sleeping noticeably better after 2 weeks of consistently taking it!
Taste great and mixes well into a smoothie
It's a bit more liquidity than the usual body wash but overall its nice. Smells good and makes my body soft.
It's a bit thick but its still nice and it smells really good. I feel as though it cleans my scalp well
It's a nice consistency, makes my hair really shiny and moisturized and smells amazing.
Love it
Why PÜRISHH?
Pure Ingredients
Handpicked and ethically sourced from trusted, natural farms.
Effective Results
Each product is designed to protect, nourish, and enhance your skin’s natural balance.
Holistic Wellness
Embrace a balanced lifestyle with supplements and creams that work in harmony with your body.
Frequently Asked Question
What makes PÜRISHH products different from conventional supplements or skincare?
What makes PÜRISHH products different from conventional supplements or skincare?
Our mission is to return to the raw, unprocessed power of nature. Every product is formulated with 100 % natural ingredients and no synthetic preservatives, fillers, or dyes. For example, the Raw Honey Butter contains whipped Wagyu beef tallow, cold‑pressed olive and coconut oils, mango butter, raw honey and beeswax – it moisturizes deeply and can even replace conventional lotion. The Raw Tallow Sunbalm uses grass‑fed tallow, non‑nano zinc oxide and organic oils to provide mineral sun protection while nourishing the skin. Our Protein Powder combines grass‑fed whey and hydrolyzed collagen with organic superfoods to deliver 26 g of easily digestible protein with zero added sugar. Across their range, Purishh keeps ingredient lists short and transparent, using only what is necessary to support health and well‑being.
Are PÜRISHH’s ingredients ethically and sustainably sourced?
Are PÜRISHH’s ingredients ethically and sustainably sourced?
Yes. The founders emphasize sustainable sourcing and ethical treatment of animals and land. Tallow for the skincare range is hand‑sourced from 100 % grass‑fed, Wagyu, halal cattle in New Zealand, ensuring humane slaughter and optimal nutrient quality. Olive and coconut oils are single‑origin, cold‑pressed. The whey in Purishh protein powder comes from grass‑fed cows raised without hormones or antibiotics, and the collagen is hydrolyzed for better absorption. These practices mean customers receive products that are both pure and sustainable.
Why does PÜRISHH use beef tallow in its skincare products?
Why does PÜRISHH use beef tallow in its skincare products?
Grass‑fed beef tallow is biocompatible with human skin; its fatty‑acid profile closely resembles natural sebum, so it’s absorbed efficiently. Properly rendered tallow is a vitamin powerhouse, naturally supplying vitamins A, D, E, and K that support cell turnover, immune function, and antioxidant protection. Tallow also contains oleic, stearic and palmitic acids that strengthen the skin’s barrier, calm inflammation and maintain moisture. Grass‑fed tallow offers a high concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), an anti‑inflammatory fatty acid. These nutrients collectively help Purishh’s Raw Honey Butter and Raw Tallow Sunbalm to moisturize, nourish and protect the skin without clogging pores or causing irritation.
How is PÜRISHH protein powder different, and why is it easy to digest?
How is PÜRISHH protein powder different, and why is it easy to digest?
Many conventional protein powders use cheap sources and add artificial thickeners or sweeteners that cause bloating and digestive discomfort. Purishh starts with grass‑fed whey processed via cold‑filtration, which preserves natural enzymes and bioactive peptides that aid digestion. It also adds hydrolyzed bovine collagen to support joints, skin and gut health. The powder uses organic monk fruit for sweetness and contains no carrageenan, gums, sucralose or artificial preservatives, so it mixes smoothly and is gentle on the stomach. Each serving provides 26 g of complete protein with only 1 g of fat and zero sugar, making it suitable for keto, gluten‑free and non‑GMO diets.
What are PÜRISHH Electrolytes, and how do they support hydration?
What are PÜRISHH Electrolytes, and how do they support hydration?
PÜRISHH’s Electrolytes formula offers clean hydration without the artificial colors and preservatives found in many sports drinks. Each serving includes over 800 mg of unrefined Himalayan salt, providing sodium and trace minerals, plus magnesium malate and potassium chloride. Organic fruit powders (raspberry or lemon‑lime) and monk fruit sweetener give a natural flavor without sugar. The formula helps replenish electrolytes lost through exercise, supports muscle function, and is keto‑friendly.
What is Raw Shilajit, and how should it be used?
What is Raw Shilajit, and how should it be used?
Raw Shilajit is a resin harvested from high‑altitude Himalayan rocks. It forms from decomposed plant material and is rich in minerals and fulvic acid. Traditionally used as an adaptogen, Shilajit helps boost energy, improve stamina and support overall health. Purishh provides 100 % pure Himalayan shilajit. Users typically dissolve a pea‑sized amount in warm water, tea or milk. Due to its potent minerals, start with a small dose and consult a healthcare professional if you have existing medical conditions.
What is the Ishh Leaky Gut Protocol?
What is the Ishh Leaky Gut Protocol?
The Ishh Leaky Gut Protocol is a step‑by‑step program designed to help restore gut health naturally. It includes dietary recommendations, lifestyle tips and natural supplements to support the intestinal lining. The protocol focuses on removing irritants, replenishing beneficial bacteria and repairing the gut barrier. It is not a medical treatment, so customers with chronic digestive issues should consult a healthcare professional before starting.
How should I store PÜRISHH products?
How should I store PÜRISHH products?
Store supplements and protein powders in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Skincare products like Raw Honey Butter and Raw Tallow Sunbalm are natural and free from artificial stabilizers; keeping them at room temperature helps maintain texture. If you live in a hot climate, refrigerating tallow‑based balms can prevent melting. Always use clean hands or a spatula to avoid introducing bacteria.
When will my order ship, and how long will delivery take?
When will my order ship, and how long will delivery take?
We ask customers to allow 2–3 business days for processing and production before an order ships. Once dispatched, average transit times are 7–10 business days; however, natural disasters, holidays and weather can cause delays. Free standard shipping is offered on orders over US$150 (or equivalent), and shipping costs for smaller orders are calculated at checkout. PÜRISHH cannot guarantee exact delivery dates because delivery is ultimately the responsibility of the shipping carrier.
Can I subscribe and save on regular purchases?
Can I subscribe and save on regular purchases?
Yes. We offer a subscription program for most of our products. Subscribe and save up to 30 % OFF your first delivery. You can choose delivery intervals (e.g., monthly). Subscriptions auto‑renew, but you may skip or cancel at any time through your account.
Are PÜRISHH products allergen‑free or suitable for special diets?
Are PÜRISHH products allergen‑free or suitable for special diets?
PÜRISHH formulates products without common synthetic additives, but some items may contain potential allergens. The protein powder contains whey (a dairy product) and collagen derived from bovine sources; it is unsuitable for vegans or those with dairy allergies. The Electrolytes formula is gluten‑free, sugar‑free and keto‑friendly. Always review ingredient lists carefully and consult your healthcare provider if you have specific allergies or dietary restrictions.
Where are PÜRISHH products made?
Where are PÜRISHH products made?
PÜRISHH sources ingredients globally, such as New Zealand Wagyu tallow and Himalayan shilajit, but manufactures products in small batches under rigorous quality control. By keeping production small and hands‑on, PÜRISHH can maintain freshness and ensure every batch meets the highest standards.
PÜR Insights
Powder vs. Capsule vs. Gummy: Does Format Change Anything?
Powder vs. Capsule vs. Gummy: Does Format Change Anything? The same supplement often comes in three or four forms. You can buy magnesium as a powder, a capsule, or a gummy. Vitamin D comes as tablets, softgels, drops, and gummies. Even creatine, traditionally a plain white powder, now shows up in capsules and chewables. It's natural to wonder whether the format makes a difference. Is a gummy as good as a capsule? Does a powder absorb faster? Are capsules "cleaner"? Marketing will happily give you an answer for each, usually whichever format the brand happens to sell. The honest answer is more interesting. For some questions, format barely matters. For others, it matters a lot, but not always for the reasons you'd expect. The biggest differences tend to be practical: how much of an ingredient can physically fit in one serving, what else has to be added to make the format work, how accurate the label is, and whether you'll actually take it consistently. This post goes through each format, what the research says about absorption, and where the real trade-offs are. A disclosure first: we sell powders (protein, creatine, and electrolytes), capsules (our magnesium), and a resin (shilajit). We don't sell any gummies. So we have no stake in the gummy side of this, though we do have one in powders and capsules. First, what "format" actually changes A supplement's format is the vehicle that delivers the active ingredient. Changing the vehicle can affect five things: Dose capacity: how much of the ingredient fits in one serving. Other ingredients: what has to be added to hold the format together, such as sugars, gelling agents, or flow agents. Absorption: how much of the ingredient gets into your bloodstream, and how fast. Accuracy and stability: whether the amount on the label is what's in the product, and whether it stays that way over time. Adherence: whether you'll actually keep taking it. Absorption gets most of the attention, but for many supplements the other four matter more. We'll come back to each. One regulatory point applies to every format. According to the FDA, under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), the agency does not have the authority to approve dietary supplements before they're marketed. Manufacturers are responsible for making sure their products aren't adulterated or misbranded, and they must follow current good manufacturing practices. That's true whether the product is a powder, capsule, gummy, softgel, or liquid. Format doesn't change who's responsible for what's in the bottle. Powders What they're good at Powders are the only practical format for supplements taken in gram amounts. Protein is the obvious example. Studies and position stands typically discuss protein in servings of 20 to 40 grams, and no capsule or gummy can deliver that. Creatine is another. The International Society of Sports Nutrition's 2017 position stand (Kreider and colleagues) describes a standard dose of 3 to 5 grams a day, which is easy to take as one scoop of powder. Powders also let you adjust the dose. You can take half a scoop or a scoop and a half, which is harder with a fixed-dose capsule. And because they're dissolved or mixed into liquid, they suit people who don't like swallowing pills. Their trade-offs Powders depend on the scoop. A scoop measures volume, not weight, so how tightly the powder is packed, how much it settles, and how you fill the scoop can all shift the amount slightly. For most supplements that variation doesn't matter. If you need precision, a small kitchen scale removes the guesswork. Taste and mixing are the other issues. Unflavored powders can taste chalky or bitter. Flavored ones need sweeteners and flavorings, which add ingredients. Some powders, protein blends in particular, don't dissolve completely. That's normal, but it can be off-putting. Powders also take more effort. You have to measure and mix them, which is less convenient when traveling or at work. That's why single-serving stick packs exist: the same powder, pre-measured. Capsules and tablets What they're good at Capsules and tablets deliver a fixed, pre-measured dose with no taste and no mixing. For ingredients taken in milligram or microgram amounts, such as vitamin D, many minerals, and herbal extracts, they're often the simplest option. Capsules come in two main shell types. Gelatin capsules are made from animal collagen; ours, for example, use beef gelatin. Plant-based capsules are usually made from a cellulose derivative called HPMC (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose). Both are designed to dissolve in the stomach. Some people choose one or the other for dietary or ethical reasons. There's also a quality standard for how well capsules and tablets break down. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) publishes a general chapter, <2040>, that sets disintegration and dissolution tests for dietary supplements. A product tested to that standard has been checked to make sure it actually breaks apart in conditions that mimic digestion. Not every product is tested this way, but it's a useful thing to look for on a label or a certificate of analysis. Their trade-offs The main limit is capacity. A capsule can only hold so much powder, typically well under a gram. That's fine for vitamin D, but it becomes a problem for larger doses. A 5-gram dose of creatine, for example, would take several large capsules. Magnesium is a middle case: reaching a meaningful dose of elemental magnesium can take two or more capsules, depending on the form used. Swallowing is the other big one, and it's more common than most people assume. A study by Schiele and colleagues (European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2013, volume 69, issue 4, pages 937 to 948) surveyed 1,051 patients in 11 general practices. It found: Overall: 37.4 percent reported difficulty swallowing tablets and capsules. Frequent difficulty: about one in 11 had frequent difficulty. Changing their medication: of those with difficulties, 58.8 percent had already modified their medication, for example by crushing or splitting it, in ways that could alter its safety or effectiveness. Who was affected: difficulties were more common in women and younger people. The authors noted that doctors grossly underestimated these problems. If you find pills hard to swallow, a different format isn't a compromise. It may be the format you'll actually take. Capsules and tablets also need some extra ingredients to work. Tablets need binders to hold them together. Capsule powders often need flow agents so the machinery can fill them evenly. These are usually present in small amounts, and they'll be listed under "other ingredients." Read that line if you want to know exactly what you're taking. Gummies What they're good at Gummies are easy to take and pleasant to eat, and for many people that's the whole point. For anyone who struggles with pills, or who simply forgets to take supplements they don't enjoy, a gummy can be the difference between taking something and not. Gummies can also deliver some vitamins well. A 2019 study by Wagner and colleagues (Nutrients, 2019, volume 11, issue 5, article 1023) compared a single 20,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 given as gummies or as tablets in healthy adults aged 18 to 45, using a crossover design. In the main study of 31 people, the gummies produced substantially higher blood levels of vitamin D3: Measure Gummies Tablets Total exposure (AUC) 1,474 ng·h/mL 774 ng·h/mL Peak level 47.3 ng/mL 23.4 ng/mL That's a striking result, and it's worth being careful about what it shows. It compared one specific gummy with one specific tablet. A poorly dissolving tablet and a well-made gummy would produce exactly this kind of gap, so the result says as much about those two products as about the formats in general. It measured vitamin D3 in the blood over 48 hours after a single large dose, not long-term vitamin D status. And it's one study. It's a good reason not to dismiss gummies out of hand. It isn't proof that gummies are better for every nutrient. Their trade-offs Gummies have three real limitations. Capacity. A gummy is small, and most of it is the gummy itself: sugars or sugar alcohols, gelling agents like gelatin or pectin, flavor, and color. That leaves limited room for the active ingredient. Ingredients needed in larger amounts, like creatine, protein, or meaningful doses of some minerals, are hard to fit, which can mean many gummies per day. We'll look at creatine specifically in a separate post. Added sugar and other ingredients. Many gummies contain added sugar. Others use sugar alcohols, which can cause digestive upset in some people when eaten in larger amounts. It's worth checking the label for added sugars per serving, especially if you take several gummy supplements a day. Accuracy. Gummies are harder to manufacture precisely than powders or capsules, and the clearest data on this comes from melatonin. A 2023 study by Cohen and colleagues in JAMA tested 25 melatonin gummy products sold in the US. It found: Mislabeled: 22 of the 25 (88 percent) were inaccurately labeled. Accurate: only 3 contained within 10 percent of the declared amount. Range: actual melatonin content ran from 74 percent to 347 percent of the labeled quantity. That doesn't mean every gummy is inaccurate. It does show that gummy manufacturing leaves real room for error, and that independent testing matters more for this format, not less. A safety note: gummies look like candy Because gummies taste and look like sweets, they carry a specific risk in homes with children. A CDC report (Lelak and colleagues, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2022, volume 71, pages 725 to 729) tracked melatonin ingestions among people aged 19 and under reported to US poison centers. It found: Total reports: 260,435 ingestions between 2012 and 2021. Rise: a 530 percent increase in annual reports over that period. Serious outcomes: 4,097 children were hospitalized. The report called for safe storage and suggested child-resistant packaging be considered. Melatonin is just one example. Any supplement that looks like candy should be stored like a medicine. Softgels and liquids, briefly Softgels and liquid drops are common for fat-soluble nutrients like vitamins D and K, which are often dissolved in oil. That reflects how these nutrients behave. They dissolve in fat, not water. But the fat in your meal may matter as much as the fat in the capsule. A study by Dawson-Hughes and colleagues in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics gave 50 healthy older adults a single 50,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 with either a fat-free meal or a meal with 30 percent of its calories from fat. Peak blood vitamin D3 was 32 percent higher when the dose was taken with the fat-containing meal. So for fat-soluble vitamins, taking them with a meal that contains some fat is a simple, evidence-based habit. It probably matters more than whether the vitamin comes in a softgel or a tablet. So does format change absorption? Pulling the evidence together, here's the honest picture. For some nutrients, formulation clearly affects absorption. The vitamin D gummy study shows that two products with the same labeled dose can produce very different blood levels. But the key word is formulation, not format. A well-made tablet and a poorly made gummy could reverse that result. Taking supplements with food can matter as much as format. For fat-soluble vitamins, taking them with a fat-containing meal raised peak vitamin D3 by about a third. For many supplements, format mainly affects practicality, not absorption. Creatine is a good example. What matters for creatine is reaching and maintaining muscle saturation with a daily dose, as covered in the ISSN position stand. A powder is simply the easiest way to get 3 to 5 grams consistently. The biggest differences between formats are usually the practical ones: dose capacity, added ingredients, label accuracy, and whether you'll take it. Side by side Best for Powder: gram-sized doses like protein, creatine, and electrolytes. Capsule or tablet: milligram and microgram doses like vitamins, minerals, and extracts. Gummy: people who won't or can't take pills, and low-dose nutrients. Dose capacity Powder: high. Capsule or tablet: limited, usually well under a gram each. Gummy: low, because much of each gummy is the gummy itself. Added ingredients Powder: few if unflavored. Flavorings and sweeteners if flavored. Capsule or tablet: the capsule shell, plus binders or flow agents. Gummy: sugars or sugar alcohols, gelling agents, flavors, and colors. Dose precision Powder: depends on the scoop. A scale helps. Capsule or tablet: pre-measured. Gummy: pre-measured, but manufacturing accuracy can vary. Swallowing Powder: not needed. Capsule or tablet: a problem for many people. 37.4 percent in one survey. Gummy: chewed. Convenience Powder: needs mixing. Stick packs help. Capsule or tablet: very convenient. Gummy: very convenient. Specific cautions Powder: taste and mixing. Capsule or tablet: pill fatigue and swallowing. Gummy: sugar, accuracy, and appeal to children. How to choose Rather than picking a favorite format, choose the right one for each supplement. Start with the dose. If you need grams of something, powder is the practical choice. If you need milligrams or micrograms, capsules, tablets, or gummies can all work. Then think about adherence. The most effective supplement is one you actually take. If you struggle with pills, choose a powder, liquid, or gummy. If you hate mixing drinks, choose capsules. Read the "other ingredients" line. Every format adds something. Decide whether you're comfortable with what's added, whether that's sugar in a gummy, sweeteners in a flavored powder, or flow agents in a capsule. Look for testing, especially for gummies. Given the accuracy issues documented for melatonin gummies, third-party testing matters for every format, and most of all for gummies. Look for batch-specific results, not just a logo. Take fat-soluble vitamins with a meal. Whatever the format, vitamins D, E, K, and A are better absorbed with some dietary fat. Store anything that looks like candy out of reach. Gummy supplements should be kept away from children, like medicine. Where our own products sit Since we sell several formats, here's why each of ours is the format it is. Powders: our protein, creatine, and electrolytes are powders because their useful doses are measured in grams. No capsule or gummy could deliver them practically. Our electrolytes also come in stick packs for convenience. Capsules: our magnesium is in beef-gelatin capsules because its dose is measured in milligrams, and a capsule delivers it without taste or mixing. Resin: our shilajit is a resin because that's its natural form. A small amount is dissolved in warm water or taken directly. None of these choices makes our products absorb "better" than a well-made alternative in another format. They're the formats that make the most practical sense for the dose of each ingredient. That's the honest reason, and it's the same logic we'd suggest you use when choosing any supplement. The honest summary Format matters, just usually not in the way marketing suggests. The clearest differences are practical. Powders are the only realistic way to take gram-sized doses like protein and creatine. Capsules deliver small, precise doses without taste, but more than a third of people in one large survey reported trouble swallowing pills. Gummies are easy to take but hold less, often add sugar, and have documented accuracy problems: in one study, 22 of 25 melatonin gummy products were mislabeled. On absorption, formulation can matter a lot. One study found a vitamin D3 gummy produced roughly double the blood levels of a vitamin D3 tablet, though that reflects those specific products as much as the formats. Taking fat-soluble vitamins with a fat-containing meal raised peak vitamin D3 by about a third, which may matter more than the format itself. So choose the format that fits the dose, check what else is in it, look for real testing, and pick the one you'll actually take every day. That last point probably matters more than any of the others. References US Food and Drug Administration. Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements. Kreider RB, Kalman DS, Antonio J, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017;14:18. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <2040> Disintegration and Dissolution of Dietary Supplements. Schiele JT, Quinzler R, Klimm HD, Pruszydlo MG, Haefeli WE. Difficulties swallowing solid oral dosage forms in a general practice population: prevalence, causes, and relationship to dosage forms. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2013;69(4):937-948. doi:10.1007/s00228-012-1417-0 Wagner CL, Shary JR, Nietert PJ, Wahlquist AE, Ebeling MD, Hollis BW. Bioequivalence studies of vitamin D gummies and tablets in healthy adults: results of a cross-over study. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1023. doi:10.3390/nu11051023 Cohen PA, Avula B, Wang YH, Katragunta K, Khan I. Quantity of melatonin and CBD in melatonin gummies sold in the US. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1401-1402. Lelak K, Vohra V, Neuman MI, Toce MS, Sethuraman U. Pediatric melatonin ingestions: United States, 2012–2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2022;71(22):725-729. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7122a1 Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Lichtenstein AH, Dolnikowski G, Palermo NJ, Rasmussen H. Dietary fat increases vitamin D-3 absorption. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;115(2):225-230. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Learn more
Tallow vs. Shea Butter vs. Petrolatum: An Honest Comparison
Tallow vs. Shea Butter vs. Petrolatum: An Honest Comparison Few skincare debates get as heated as this one. Tallow is having a moment, with countless posts calling it the original moisturizer. Shea butter has been the go-to "natural" option for years. And petrolatum, the plain jelly in the tub, gets defended by dermatologists and attacked by the clean-beauty crowd in roughly equal measure. We make tallow-based products, so you might expect this post to declare tallow the winner. It won't. On the one thing that can be measured most precisely, how well a product stops water escaping from your skin, petrolatum has the strongest data of the three. Tallow's direct clinical evidence is thin. Shea's is somewhere in between, and mostly indirect. That doesn't mean tallow is a bad choice. It means the reasons to choose any of these three are different from what most marketing claims. This post goes through what each one is, what the evidence actually measures, where each one falls short, and how to choose for your own skin. A disclosure up front: we sell tallow-based body products, and we don't sell shea butter or petrolatum products. So we have a clear stake in this comparison. We've tried to hold tallow to the same standard as the other two, and in places it doesn't come out ahead. A quick primer: how moisturizers work Before comparing ingredients, it helps to know the three jobs a moisturizing ingredient can do. A 2017 review in Clinical Medicine and Research by Purnamawati and colleagues (volume 15, issues 3 and 4, pages 75 to 87) describes them this way: Occlusives are mostly oil-based and form a water-repellent layer on the skin, blocking water from evaporating out of it. This loss is called transepidermal water loss, or TEWL. Emollients are lipid-based. They fill the gaps between skin cells, making the skin feel smoother and more flexible. Humectants are water-attracting substances, such as glycerin or honey, that help the outer layer of skin hold on to water. All three of the ingredients in this post are fats or oils, so they work mainly as occlusives and emollients. None of them is a humectant. That matters, because it means none of them adds water to your skin. They help keep the water that's already there, which is why they tend to work best on skin that's slightly damp, or alongside a humectant. With that in mind, here's each ingredient. Petrolatum: the measured benchmark What it is Petrolatum, often called petroleum jelly, is a semi-solid mixture of hydrocarbons refined from petroleum. The grade used in skincare is highly refined. It has no fragrance and no active compounds. It's essentially an inert, water-repellent layer. What the evidence shows Petrolatum is the most studied of the three, and the reason is simple: it's what dermatology research often uses as a reference point. The Purnamawati review calls it "the most effective classic occlusive moisturizer." It reports that petrolatum can reduce transepidermal water loss by more than 98 percent, at a concentration of at least 5 percent. That figure comes from a 1992 study by Ghadially and colleagues in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Petrolatum also seems to do more than sit on top of the skin. A widely cited review by Lodén (American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2003, volume 4, issue 11, pages 771 to 788) notes that petrolatum has an immediate barrier-repairing effect in skin whose natural lipids have been stripped away. Where it falls short Petrolatum's weaknesses are mostly about feel and preference, not effectiveness. The Purnamawati review lists greasy consistency and potential allergenicity as drawbacks of occlusives as a group. Petrolatum is heavy and shiny, and many people simply don't like how it feels, especially on the face or over large areas of the body. It also contributes nothing beyond occlusion. It has no fatty acids, no vitamins, and no plant compounds. For some people that's a feature. For others, it's the reason they look elsewhere. Some people also avoid petrolatum because it's derived from petroleum, for environmental or ingredient-philosophy reasons. That's a legitimate personal preference. But it's a different question from whether petrolatum works, and on that question the data is clear. Shea butter: a plant fat with indirect evidence What it is Shea butter is a fat extracted from the kernels of the shea tree, Vitellaria paradoxa (also known as Butyrospermum parkii), which grows across a band of sub-Saharan Africa. A review by Honfo and colleagues (Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2014, volume 54, issue 5, pages 673 to 686) reports that shea kernels contain between 17.4 and 59.1 grams of fat per 100 grams of dry weight. The fat is traditionally extracted by roasting, pressing, and churning with water. Shea butter's fat is made up mostly of stearic and oleic acids. It's also notable for a fraction of compounds that aren't fats, including triterpenes. A 2018 review of plant oils in skincare by Lin, Zhong, and Santiago (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, volume 19, issue 1, article 70) notes that triterpenes are abundant in shea butter. What the evidence shows Shea's evidence is mostly about its composition and laboratory activity, rather than direct head-to-head trials on human skin. The Honfo review notes that shea butter has shown some antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. The Lin review discusses triterpenes as a class of compounds with potentially useful effects on skin. But it's important not to transfer what's known about a compound class directly onto shea butter as a finished product. Laboratory activity is a reason for interest, not proof of a benefit you'd notice. As a moisturizer, shea behaves the way a plant butter should. It's an emollient and a moderate occlusive, solid at room temperature and softening on contact with skin. Where it falls short There are two main limits. Variable composition. The Honfo review specifically notes wide variation in reported composition values for shea products, and it calls for better analytical methods and work on quality and shelf life. Raw and refined shea butters can differ, as can shea from different regions and processing methods. "Shea butter" on a label doesn't guarantee a consistent product. Thin direct clinical data. We aren't aware of strong clinical trials showing that shea butter on its own outperforms petrolatum on measured water loss. Its appeal rests mainly on its plant origin, its texture, and its composition. Tallow: popular, plausible, and thinly studied What it is Tallow is rendered animal fat, in skincare usually from beef. Rendering melts the fat and separates it from other tissue, leaving a solid, creamy fat once cooled. A 2025 review in Dermatology Times describes beef tallow as roughly 50 to 55 percent saturated fatty acids (mainly palmitic and stearic acid), 40 to 45 percent monounsaturated fat (mainly oleic acid), and trace amounts of vitamins A, D, E, and K. The "just like your skin's own oils" claim The most common argument for tallow is that it closely resembles human sebum, the oil your skin produces. That claim is partly true, and it's worth being precise about which part. According to a review of skin surface lipids by Wójcik and colleagues (Advances in Dermatology and Allergology, 2011, volume 28, issue 6, pages 498 to 505), human sebum is made up of roughly: 57 percent triglycerides 25 percent wax esters 15 percent squalene 2 percent cholesterol esters 1 percent cholesterol Tallow is essentially a triglyceride fat. So it overlaps with the largest single part of sebum, and some of its fatty acids are also found in sebum. But it doesn't supply the wax esters and squalene that together make up around 40 percent of sebum. The accurate version of the claim, then: tallow shares some features with sebum, especially its triglycerides. It isn't a replica of it. And sharing features with sebum doesn't by itself prove a skin benefit. That has to be tested directly. What the evidence shows This is where tallow's case is weakest, and we'd rather say so than have you find out elsewhere. A 2025 cross-sectional study by Almatroud and colleagues (Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2025, volume 24, issue 12, article e70544) analyzed 200 beef tallow skincare posts on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. The researchers found: Evidence gap: a large gap between online enthusiasm and scientific evidence. Financial bias: frequent financial bias in the posts. Risks: little discussion of risks. Quality standards: 82 different tallow retailers, with no standardized quality or manufacturing guidelines. They concluded that there was insufficient scientific evidence to determine whether beef tallow is helpful or harmful for acne, psoriasis, or atopic dermatitis. The Dermatology Times review reached a similar view. It noted that most support for tallow is extrapolated from studies of its individual fatty acids, not from clinical trials of tallow products. It argued that because those fatty acids can have conflicting effects on the skin, it's hard to predict tallow's net effect for any one person. We aren't aware of randomized controlled trials testing tallow as a skincare product against petrolatum, shea, or a standard moisturizer. That's the honest state of the evidence. Where it falls short Beyond the evidence gap, two practical issues stand out. Acne-prone skin. The Dermatology Times review suggests that people with acne should be cautious with heavy, saturated-fat-rich occlusive products. It says tallow may be tolerated by some people with thicker, non-facial, non-acne-prone skin. If you're prone to breakouts, it's sensible to test any rich balm, tallow included, on a small area before using it on your face. Quality varies. The Almatroud study's finding of no standardized manufacturing guidelines matters. How the fat is sourced, rendered, filtered, and stored affects the final product, including its smell and how long it stays fresh. Side by side What it is Petrolatum: refined petroleum hydrocarbons. Shea butter: plant fat from shea kernels. Tallow: rendered animal fat, usually beef. Main role Petrolatum: occlusive. Shea butter: emollient and moderate occlusive. Tallow: emollient and occlusive. Measured water-loss data Petrolatum: the strongest. More than 98 percent reduction in TEWL at 5 percent or more. Shea butter: limited direct data. Tallow: no controlled trials that we're aware of. Extra compounds Petrolatum: none. It's inert. Shea butter: triterpenes and other non-fat compounds. Tallow: fatty acids and trace fat-soluble vitamins. Strongest evidence type Petrolatum: clinical and barrier-repair studies. Shea butter: composition and lab activity. Tallow: composition and extrapolation from its fatty acids. Consistency between products Petrolatum: high, if highly refined. Shea butter: variable by source and processing. Tallow: variable, with no standard guidelines. Main drawback Petrolatum: heavy and greasy feel. Petroleum-derived. Shea butter: variable quality. Thin clinical data. Tallow: thin clinical data. Caution for acne-prone skin. Suits people who… Petrolatum: want maximum occlusion and don't mind the feel. Shea butter: prefer plant-based ingredients. Tallow: prefer animal-based, whole-ingredient products. What none of them should be used for Two clarifications apply to all three ingredients, and they matter more than any of the differences above. None of them is a sunscreen. A layer of fat or jelly is not tested sun protection. That includes our own Sun Balm, which is a tallow-based balm and not a sunscreen. If you need sun protection, use a product with a tested SPF and follow its directions. None of them is a treatment for a skin condition. The Almatroud study found no reliable evidence either way on tallow for acne, psoriasis, or atopic dermatitis. If you have a diagnosed skin condition, choose a moisturizer with your dermatologist rather than switching based on social media. How to choose, honestly Since none of the three wins on every measure, the right choice depends on what you care about most. If you want the most proven occlusion, choose petrolatum. On measured water-loss reduction, it's the clear leader. It's inexpensive and consistent, and it's widely recommended for very dry or compromised skin. If you can live with the feel, it's hard to beat on the numbers. If you prefer a plant-based option, choose shea butter. It has a pleasant texture and an interesting composition. Its clinical evidence is thinner than petrolatum's, and quality varies, so look for a reputable source. If you prefer whole, animal-based ingredients, tallow is a reasonable choice. That goes especially for the body, and for skin that isn't acne-prone. Choose it because you like the ingredient and how it feels, not because it's been proven superior, because it hasn't. Patch test first, especially on the face. For any of them, apply to slightly damp skin. All three hold in water rather than add it. Using them right after a shower, or over a humectant, makes the most of how they actually work. Why we use tallow anyway You might reasonably ask why we make tallow products if petrolatum has better data. The honest answer is that we're not claiming tallow outperforms petrolatum. We use it because many of our customers prefer simple, animal-based ingredients over petroleum-derived ones, and like how tallow feels on their skin. That's a preference, and we think it's a legitimate one, as long as it's presented as a preference rather than dressed up as settled science. What we can control is the quality of what we make and how honestly we describe it. That means telling you what tallow is, what the evidence does and doesn't show, and not calling our balm something it isn't. The honest summary Tallow, shea butter, and petrolatum are all fats that help skin hold on to water. None of them adds moisture on its own. Petrolatum has the strongest measured evidence. It can reduce transepidermal water loss by more than 98 percent, and it has an immediate barrier-repairing effect on lipid-depleted skin. Its downsides are feel and origin, not effectiveness. Shea butter is a plant fat rich in stearic and oleic acids, with notable triterpenes. Its evidence is mostly about composition and lab activity, and its quality varies. Tallow shares some features with sebum, mainly its triglycerides, but lacks the wax esters and squalene that make up around 40 percent of sebum. A 2025 analysis found insufficient scientific evidence to say whether it helps or harms skin conditions, alongside frequent financial bias in how it's promoted online. So choose petrolatum if you want the most proven occlusion. Choose shea if you prefer plant-based ingredients. Choose tallow if you prefer whole, animal-based ingredients and your skin tolerates it. Be skeptical of anyone, including us, who tells you one of them is a miracle. References Purnamawati S, Indrastuti N, Danarti R, Saefudin T. The role of moisturizers in addressing various kinds of dermatitis: a review. Clinical Medicine and Research. 2017;15(3-4):75-87. doi:10.3121/cmr.2017.1363 Ghadially R, Halkier-Sorensen L, Elias PM. Effects of petrolatum on stratum corneum structure and function. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1992;26(3):387-396. (Cited via reference 1.) Lodén M. Role of topical emollients and moisturizers in the treatment of dry skin barrier disorders. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2003;4(11):771-788. doi:10.2165/00128071-200304110-00005 Honfo FG, Akissoe N, Linnemann AR, Soumanou M, van Boekel MAJS. Nutritional composition of shea products and chemical properties of shea butter: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2014;54(5):673-686. doi:10.1080/10408398.2011.604142 Lin TK, Zhong L, Santiago JL. Anti-inflammatory and skin barrier repair effects of topical application of some plant oils. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(1):70. doi:10.3390/ijms19010070 Wójcik A, Budzisz E, Rotsztejn H. Skin surface lipids and their measurements. Advances in Dermatology and Allergology. 2011;28(6):498-505. Almatroud L, Choi S, Libson K, Ashack K. Beef tallow-based skincare claims in social media: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2025;24(12):e70544. doi:10.1111/jocd.70544 Social Media Mythbusters: Beef Tallow. Dermatology Times. 2025.
Learn more
Shilajit vs. Ashwagandha: Two Adaptogens, Two Evidence Bases
Shilajit vs. Ashwagandha: Two Adaptogens, Two Evidence Bases Shilajit and ashwagandha are often mentioned in the same breath. Both come out of Ayurvedic tradition. Both are sold as "adaptogens." And both show up in the same corners of the internet, usually with similar promises about energy, stress, and vitality. Look closer and they have very little in common. One is a plant root. The other is a mineral-rich resin that seeps out of mountain rock. They've been studied for different things, in different people, to very different depths. Their main safety concerns are different too. Comparing them is less like comparing two brands of the same thing and more like comparing two separate research files that happen to sit on the same shelf. This post opens both files. For each one we'll look at what it actually is, what the human trials found and how big those trials were, where the evidence is thin, and what the safety picture looks like. A disclosure first: we sell shilajit, and we don't sell ashwagandha. That gives us a reason to favor one side, so we've tried to hold shilajit to the same standard as ashwagandha. As you'll see, on some measures ashwagandha's evidence base is actually the larger of the two. First, what does "adaptogen" mean? Both products are marketed as adaptogens, so it's worth knowing what that word does and doesn't mean. The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) describes an adaptogen as a compound or product that increases a person's ability to resist, adapt to, or become resilient to stressors. It also notes that this definition is loose. The European Medicines Agency went further. In a 2008 reflection paper on the adaptogenic concept, its herbal medicines committee concluded that "the term is not accepted in pharmacological and clinical terminology that is commonly used in the EU." So "adaptogen" is a traditional and marketing category, not a recognized pharmacological class. Calling two products adaptogens tells you very little about whether they work, or whether they work in the same way. For that, you have to look at each one's evidence directly. What each one actually is Ashwagandha Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) is, in the words of the ODS, an evergreen shrub cultivated in tropical and subtropical areas of Asia, Africa, and Europe. Most commercial supplements contain extracts from the plant's root. Some also include leaf extract, and the ODS notes that the root and leaf differ chemically. Extracts are often standardized to a group of compounds called withanolides. Shilajit Shilajit isn't a plant at all. It's a dark, resin-like substance that forms over long periods as plant material breaks down within rock in high mountain ranges, and it seeps out of cracks in the rock. It's rich in fulvic and humic acids, organic compounds formed as plant matter decomposes, along with a wide range of minerals. That difference matters for how you judge quality. With ashwagandha, the main questions are which plant part was used, what extract it is, and how it's standardized. With shilajit, the questions are whether it's genuine, whether it has been properly purified, and what it contains, including what it shouldn't. Raw shilajit can carry heavy metals and microbial contamination, so purification and testing aren't optional extras. The ashwagandha evidence base Ashwagandha has the larger body of human research of the two. It has been tested in a fair number of randomized controlled trials, and several meta-analyses have pooled those results. Stress and anxiety This is ashwagandha's most-studied area. The ODS summarizes it this way: research suggests ashwagandha extracts may lower stress, anxiety, and cortisol levels. It describes a 2021 review of seven trials with 491 adults, lasting six to eight weeks, which found reduced stress and anxiety compared with placebo. The benefits appeared greater at doses of 500 to 600 milligrams a day than at lower doses. The ODS also notes that a 2022 taskforce of two psychiatric organizations, the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT), provisionally recommended specific daily doses of ashwagandha root extract for generalized anxiety disorder. That recommendation was 300 to 600 milligrams a day of root extract standardized to 5 percent withanolides. The taskforce said stronger recommendations would require more data. Sleep The most cited analysis here is a 2021 meta-analysis by Cheah and colleagues (PLoS ONE, 2021, volume 16, issue 9, article e0257843). They pooled five randomized controlled trials with 400 participants. Their findings: Overall sleep: a small but significant effect, with a standardized mean difference of −0.59 (95 percent CI −0.75 to −0.42). The quality of evidence for this outcome was rated moderate. By population: the effect was larger in adults with diagnosed insomnia (−0.84) than in healthy adults (−0.63). By dose: doses of 600 milligrams a day or more showed a larger effect (−0.69) than lower doses (−0.44). By duration: treatment for eight weeks or longer showed a larger effect (−0.68) than shorter treatment (−0.37). Other outcomes: mental alertness on waking and anxiety also improved. Quality of life showed no significant change. The authors concluded that ashwagandha extract appears to have a beneficial effect on sleep in adults. They added that data on serious adverse effects is limited and that more is needed before judging long-term use. Testosterone and other areas The ODS notes that ashwagandha might also increase testosterone levels. It mentions this mainly as a safety point: for that reason, experts say it might not be safe for men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. It has also been studied for athletic performance and other areas, but stress, anxiety, and sleep are where the research is most developed. The limits of the ashwagandha evidence A larger evidence base isn't the same as a settled one. Several limits are worth knowing. Many different extracts. The ODS lists a long set of branded ashwagandha extracts used in trials and notes that studies have used various preparations, which makes specific recommendations difficult. A result from one extract doesn't automatically transfer to another, or to a generic root powder. Wide dose range. Stress and anxiety trials used anywhere from 240 to 1,250 milligrams a day of extract, and one used 12,000 milligrams a day of whole root granules. Short trials. According to the ODS, trials have lasted from 30 days to 12 weeks, mostly six to 12 weeks. It concludes that ashwagandha appears to be well tolerated for up to about three months, but its long-term safety is not known. The shilajit evidence base Shilajit's human research is much smaller. There are no meta-analyses of shilajit that we're aware of. Instead, there are a small number of randomized trials, each studying a specific outcome in a specific group. Two are worth knowing in detail. Testosterone in middle-aged men A 2016 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Pandit and colleagues (Andrologia, 2016, volume 48, issue 5, pages 570 to 575) gave healthy men aged 45 to 55 either 250 milligrams of purified shilajit twice a day or placebo for 90 days. In the shilajit group, total testosterone rose by about 20 percent over the study, from 398.8 to 474.9 ng/dL. Free testosterone rose by about 19 percent. Two other hormones, LH and FSH, which signal the testes to produce testosterone, stayed stable. That's a real result from a controlled trial. But it's one trial, in one group (healthy men in midlife), with one preparation (purified shilajit). It doesn't tell us what happens in younger men, in women, or with unpurified products. To our knowledge, the testosterone finding hasn't been replicated at a larger scale by independent groups. Strength retention during fatigue A 2019 randomized, placebo-controlled trial by Keller and colleagues at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2019, volume 16, article 3) studied 63 recreationally active men. Over eight weeks, they took 250 milligrams a day of shilajit, 500 milligrams a day, or placebo, and then performed a fatiguing exercise protocol. Among the top half of each group, here's how much maximal strength declined: 500 milligrams a day: 8.9 percent 250 milligrams a day: 17 percent Placebo: 16 percent The 500-milligram group also had significantly lower levels of hydroxyproline in the blood. That's an indirect marker of collagen breakdown. There are three important caveats: Subgroup only. The headline difference appeared in the top half of each group, not across all participants. Indirect marker. Hydroxyproline is a stand-in measure, not a direct measure of tissue health. Manufacturer involvement. The shilajit used was a branded, purified extract supplied by its manufacturer. The limits of the shilajit evidence Put plainly, shilajit's human evidence is: Small: a handful of trials with dozens of participants each, not hundreds or thousands. Narrow: mostly men, and mostly specific outcomes like hormones and fatigue. Dependent on purified preparations: the trials used purified, standardized material, which isn't what every product on the market contains. Not pooled: there's no meta-analysis to show how consistent the findings are. That doesn't make the findings wrong. It means they're early. "Promising, specific, and unreplicated" is the honest description. Side by side What it is Ashwagandha: root (sometimes leaf) extract of a shrub. Shilajit: a mineral-rich resin from mountain rock, high in fulvic acid. Most-studied areas Ashwagandha: stress, anxiety, sleep. Shilajit: testosterone in midlife men, strength retention during fatigue. Size of evidence Ashwagandha: multiple RCTs and several meta-analyses. Shilajit: a few small RCTs and no meta-analyses. Best single summary Ashwagandha: sleep meta-analysis, 5 RCTs and 400 people, small but significant effect, moderate-quality evidence for overall sleep. Shilajit: two individual trials, of 63 men and of men aged 45 to 55. Typical studied doses Ashwagandha: 240 to 1,250 mg/day of extract for stress, and 250 to 600 mg/day for sleep. Shilajit: 250 to 500 mg/day of purified material. Trial length Ashwagandha: mostly 6 to 12 weeks. Shilajit: 8 to 12 weeks. Main quality issue Ashwagandha: many different extracts that aren't interchangeable. Shilajit: authenticity, purification, and contamination. Main safety signals Ashwagandha: rare liver injury reports, possible thyroid effects, pregnancy cautions, and restrictions in some countries. Shilajit: heavy metal and microbial contamination in poorly processed material, and limited formal safety data. Long-term safety Ashwagandha: "not known" beyond about 3 months, according to the ODS. Shilajit: not established. Safety: different risks, not more or less Ashwagandha The ODS says common side effects of ashwagandha are mild: stomach upset, loose stools, nausea, and drowsiness. But it also lists more serious concerns. Liver. There are a few reports of acute liver injury, some in people who had pre-existing liver disease. The ODS notes that product contents weren't independently verified in all cases. Thyroid. Some research suggests ashwagandha might affect thyroid function, and case reports describe thyrotoxicosis, an excess of thyroid hormone. The ODS notes it might interact with thyroid hormone medications. Pregnancy. Some experts advise against ashwagandha during pregnancy. Regulation. According to the ODS, Denmark banned ashwagandha in 2023 following a risk assessment. France's food safety agency, ANSES, issued a 2024 statement recommending against its use in certain groups, including pregnant and breastfeeding women. None of this means ashwagandha is dangerous for most people. In trials, it's generally well tolerated over the short term. But its safety profile has specific, documented flags that anyone considering it should know about. Anyone with a liver or thyroid condition, anyone taking medication, and anyone who is pregnant should talk to a clinician first. Shilajit Shilajit's main risk is in the product itself. Because it's a natural material collected from rock, raw or poorly processed shilajit can contain heavy metals and microbes. That's why purification and batch testing matter so much. It's also why the trials above, which used purified preparations, can't vouch for every jar sold under the same name. Formal safety data on shilajit is limited. The trials were short and small, and they don't add up to a long-term safety record. As with any supplement, anyone who is pregnant, has a medical condition, or takes medication should check with a clinician before using it. What our own batch shows Since we sell shilajit, here's what our current batch's certificate of analysis reports. This certificate comes through our supplier's lab, not a lab we commissioned directly. We say that every time we share it, so you can weigh it accordingly. Fulvic and humic acid Fulvic acid: 72 percent Humic acid: 8.3 percent Heavy metals (result vs. permitted level, mg/kg) Lead: 0.67, against a permitted level of 6 Cadmium: 0.12, against 1 Arsenic: 0.08, against 12 Mercury: below 0.01, against 1 Microbes and authenticity Pathogenic bacteria, including salmonella: absent Authenticity test result: "Authentic" These numbers tell you about purity and composition. They don't tell you our shilajit will reproduce the trial results above, because those trials used a specific purified preparation, and nobody has tested ours against it head to head. Can you take them together? We're not aware of good-quality trials testing shilajit and ashwagandha together. So we can't say whether combining them helps, or whether it changes the safety picture. Ashwagandha's possible effects on thyroid function and hormones, and the general lack of long-term data on both, are good reasons to talk to a clinician before stacking them, especially if you take any medication. How to think about choosing This isn't medical advice, but the evidence points to a few sensible principles. Match the product to the evidence, not the label. "Adaptogen" doesn't tell you what something does. Ashwagandha's research centers on stress, anxiety, and sleep. Shilajit's centers on a narrow set of outcomes in men, such as testosterone in midlife and strength retention under fatigue. If your goal doesn't match either evidence base, neither product has good evidence for it. Check what was actually studied. With ashwagandha, look for the plant part, the extract, the withanolide standardization, and the dose, and compare them with the trials. With shilajit, look for evidence of purification, a fulvic acid figure, and a batch-specific heavy metal panel with actual numbers rather than just "pass." Respect the time limits. Most trials of both lasted three months or less. Long-term safety isn't established for either. Know the specific safety flags. For ashwagandha: liver, thyroid, pregnancy, and hormone-sensitive conditions. For shilajit: contamination and authenticity. The honest summary Shilajit and ashwagandha share a label, "adaptogen," that the European Medicines Agency doesn't accept as a pharmacological term. Beyond that label, they're different substances with different evidence bases. Ashwagandha is a root extract with the larger body of research. A meta-analysis of five trials and 400 people found a small but significant improvement in sleep, larger at 600 milligrams a day or more and over at least eight weeks. Reviews also suggest reduced stress and anxiety. But trials used many different extracts, rarely lasted past 12 weeks, and the safety profile includes rare liver injury reports, possible thyroid effects, and regulatory restrictions in some European countries. Shilajit is a mineral-rich resin with a much smaller research base. A 90-day trial in men aged 45 to 55 found about a 20 percent rise in total testosterone. An eight-week trial in 63 men found better strength retention under fatigue at 500 milligrams a day, in the top half of each group. Both used purified preparations, neither has been replicated at scale, and the main risk lies in the quality of the product itself. If you're considering either, start with what you actually want, check whether the research matches it, look for proof of what's in the product, and talk to a clinician if you have a health condition or take medication. References NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Ashwagandha: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. European Medicines Agency, Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products. Reflection paper on the adaptogenic concept. EMEA/HMPC/102655/2007. Adopted 8 May 2008. Cheah KL, Norhayati MN, Husniati Yaacob L, Abdul Rahman R. Effect of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) extract on sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257843 Pandit S, Biswas S, Jana U, De RK, Mukhopadhyay SC, Biswas TK. Clinical evaluation of purified Shilajit on testosterone levels in healthy volunteers. Andrologia. 2016;48(5):570-575. doi:10.1111/and.12482 Keller JL, Housh TJ, Hill EC, Smith CM, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. The effects of Shilajit supplementation on fatigue-induced decreases in muscular strength and serum hydroxyproline levels. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2019;16:3. doi:10.1186/s12970-019-0270-2 These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Learn more